Deriving Friedmann Equation from RW Metric - Blumfeld

AI Thread Summary
The Friedmann equation is a constraint derived from the Robertson-Walker (RW) metric and the Einstein field equations, specifically involving the stress-energy tensor. It cannot be directly derived from the RW metric alone without considering the stress-energy tensor, which typically includes components like energy density and pressure. The discussion highlights the importance of using the correct stress-energy tensor, often represented as {-ρ, p, p, p}. Participants suggest consulting "Relativity Demystified" by David McMahon for a worked example of deriving the Friedmann equations. Additional resources for the derivation of this constraint equation from Einstein's field equations are also sought.
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hi does anyone know a website or paper where the friedmann equation is derived from the robertson walker metric?
it should have the calculation of atleast a few of the christoffel symbols etc

thanks

blumfeld
 
Space news on Phys.org
The Friedmann equation can't be derived from the RW metric. It is a constraint on that metric, which is derived from the GR field equations. In other words, you can't derive it wityout the stress-energy tensor.
 
You may be interested in reading Relativity Demystified by David McMahon. On page 161 the following problem is worked out: Consider the Robertson-Walker metric and suppose we take the Einstein equation with nonzero constant, find the Friedman equations.
 
Hello Thank you for the reply
So the friedmann equation is a constraint on the metric derived from the stress energy tensor
what specific stress energy tensor is used? just the diagonal
{-rho, p, p ,p }?
also are theere any websites that have the derivation of this constraint equation from einsteins field equations>?
i will also try to check out the book you recommended
thanks!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top