Why Is the Norm of the Tangent Vector Constant in Geodesic Equations?

Nabigh R
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am trying to derive the geodesic equation by extremising the integral
$$ \ell = \int d\tau $$
Now after applying Euler-Lagrange equation, I finally get the following:
$$ \ddot{x}^\tau + \Gamma^\tau_{\mu \nu} \dot{x}^\mu \dot{x}^\nu = \frac{1}{2} \dot{x}^\tau \frac{d}{ds} \ln \left| \dot{x}_\nu \dot{x}^\nu \right| $$
where ## \dot{x}^\tau \equiv \frac{d x^\tau}{ds} ## and ##s## is a parameter. Now I get the geodesic equation if the right-hand side vanishes, and the only way that happens is if ## \dot{x}_\nu \dot{x}^\nu ## is constant. Now the question is why is it constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nabigh R said:
I am trying to derive the geodesic equation by extremising the integral
$$ \ell = \int d\tau $$
Now after applying Euler-Lagrange equation, I finally get the following:
$$ \ddot{x}^\tau + \Gamma^\tau_{\mu \nu} \dot{x}^\mu \dot{x}^\nu = \frac{1}{2} \dot{x}^\tau \frac{d}{ds} \ln \left| \dot{x}_\nu \dot{x}^\nu \right| $$
where ## \dot{x}^\tau \equiv \frac{d x^\tau}{ds} ## and ##s## is a parameter. Now I get the geodesic equation if the right-hand side vanishes, and the only way that happens is if ## \dot{x}_\nu \dot{x}^\nu ## is constant. Now the question is why is it constant?

Well, s is an arbitrary parameter. We are free to choose any parametrization we like. One particular parametrization, which is possible for slower-than-light geodesics, is to let

ds = \sqrt{|dx^\mu dx_\mu|}

For this choice, |\frac{dx^\mu}{ds} \frac{dx_\mu}{ds}| = 1
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Nabigh R said:
$$ \ddot{x}^\tau + \Gamma^\tau_{\mu \nu} \dot{x}^\mu \dot{x}^\nu = \frac{1}{2} \dot{x}^\tau \frac{d}{ds} \ln \left| \dot{x}_\nu \dot{x}^\nu \right| $$
where ## \dot{x}^\tau \equiv \frac{d x^\tau}{ds} ## and ##s## is a parameter. Now I get the geodesic equation if the right-hand side vanishes, and the only way that happens is if ## \dot{x}_\nu \dot{x}^\nu ## is constant. Now the question is why is it constant?
The geodesic equation takes its usual form only when s is chosen to be an affine parameter. For a timelike geodesic this means s must be a linear function of proper time, s = aτ + b where a and b are constants. If s is not an affine parameter, the geodesic equation has the extra term you mentioned.
 
Thanks Bill, Wikipedia too says a similar thing, but what exactly is an affine parameter?
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top