Deriving Relations for Partial Derivatives in a System of Four Variables

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


Given 4 state variables x, y, z and w such that F(x,y,z)=0 and w depends on 2 of the other variables, show the following relations:
1)\left ( \frac{\partial x }{\partial y } \right ) _z = \frac{1}{\left ( \frac{\partial y }{\partial x } \right ) _z}
2)\left ( \frac{\partial x }{\partial y } \right ) _z \left ( \frac{\partial y }{\partial z } \right ) _x \left ( \frac{\partial z }{\partial x } \right ) _y=-1
3)\left ( \frac{\partial x }{\partial w } \right ) _z=\left ( \frac{\partial x }{\partial y } \right ) _z\left ( \frac{\partial y }{\partial w } \right ) _z
4)\left ( \frac{\partial x }{\partial y } \right ) _z=\left ( \frac{\partial x }{\partial y } \right ) _w+\left ( \frac{\partial x }{\partial w } \right ) _y \left ( \frac{\partial w }{\partial y } \right ) _z


Homework Equations


Hints: for 1) and 2) think about x as x(y,z) and then y=y(x,z)
For 3) choose x=x(x,z)
For 4) choose x=(y,w)

The Attempt at a Solution


Stuck on 1). I'd be tempted to consider differentials like numbers and that way 1) would be instantly "proven". However I do not see how to use the tips provided.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume (dx/dy)_z means derivative of x w.r.t. y when z is fixed.
since F=0, dF=F_x dx+F_y dy+F_z dz=0. When z is fixed, dz=0, so F_x dx=-F_y dy, etc.
 
sunjin09 said:
I assume (dx/dy)_z means derivative of x w.r.t. y when z is fixed.
since F=0, dF=F_x dx+F_y dy+F_z dz=0. When z is fixed, dz=0, so F_x dx=-F_y dy, etc.
Thank you very much for this huge tip. Will be working on that problem and post if I'm stuck.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top