Deriving Relativistic Pressure of Ideal Gas: Why Am I Getting v/c?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeremy Wittkopp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules Relativistic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the relativistic pressure of an ideal gas, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding the inclusion of the velocity term in the pressure equation. The user attempts to adapt the classical ideal gas law, P = (1/3)(N/V)mv², to a relativistic context, ultimately arriving at P = (2/3)(N/V)(ϒ - 1)mc², where ϒ is the Lorentz factor. The user questions the validity of including the term v/c and seeks clarification on its implications for ultrarelativistic particles, indicating a misunderstanding of the relationship between momentum and energy in relativistic physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic theory and ideal gas laws
  • Familiarity with relativistic mechanics and the Lorentz factor (ϒ)
  • Knowledge of relativistic energy and momentum equations
  • Basic grasp of thermodynamic pressure concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of relativistic momentum and its relationship to energy
  • Learn about the implications of the Lorentz factor in relativistic physics
  • Explore the concept of pressure in relativistic gases and its mathematical formulations
  • Investigate the differences between classical and relativistic kinetic energy
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, and anyone interested in the application of relativistic principles to gas dynamics.

Jeremy Wittkopp
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Suppose the molecules of an ideal gas move with a speed comparable to the speed of light. I am trying to adapt the kinetic theory to express the pressure of the gas in terms of m and the relativistic energy, but each time I try to derive the expression, I get: P = (1/3)(N/V)(v/c)√(E2 - m2c2).

N/V - number density
v - velocity
c - speed of light
E - relativistic energy
m - rest mass

There shouldn't be the term for velocity. Idk what I am doing wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is v/c for an ultrarelativistic particle?
 
Wouldn't it be: pc/E? But in my derivation, I already inputted momentum, so I'm still a bit confused.
 
I tried this derivation again, I'll show my work this time:

Classical Ideal Gas: P = (1/3)(N/V)mv2 = (2/3) * (1/2)mv2 * (N/V) = (2/3)K(N/V) (assuming only 3 degrees of freedom)
P - pressure
N - # of particles
V - volume
m - mass
v - velocity
K - kinetic energy

Krel = (ϒ - 1)mc2
where
c - speed of light
ϒ - Lorentz factor

So then: P = (2/3)(N/V)(ϒ - 1)mc2

Tell me if I am just crazy, relativity isn't my strongest area.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K