Deriving the Characteristic Function of the Gaussian Distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuanle007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the characteristic function of the Gaussian distribution, specifically addressing confusion over a mathematical expression. Participants clarify that the expected value of a function is calculated using its probability density function. An error in the derivation is noted regarding the x^2 term, which should simply be x. There is a misunderstanding about the equivalence of two exponential expressions, with participants emphasizing that the task is to prove the characteristic function for the Gaussian distribution. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting mathematical statements and definitions.
tuanle007
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
hello, can someone look at my problem and tell me how to get to the arrow?
thank you so much..
i am studying for my midterm and i have no clue where it come from.
thanks
 

Attachments

  • untitled.PNG
    untitled.PNG
    9.4 KB · Views: 488
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That first line you point to is basically just the definition of how you find the "expected value" of a function.

That is, if a random variable X has a pdf (probablity density function) of f(x) then the expected value of x can be written as,

E(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x f(x) dx

And more generally the expected value of a function of x can be written as,

E(\, \phi(x)\, ) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \phi(x) f(x) dx
 
Last edited:
BTW, there's an error in that derivation. The x^2 term that appears in the first square bracketed term in line 4 (2nd line under the completing the square heading) should be just "x" (not squared). This error is carried all the way through the derivation BTW.
 
yeah.i understand that part..
but how does exp(-o^2w^2/2) = exp(-x^2/2o^2)?
the arrow...
 
tuanle007 said:
yeah.i understand that part..
but how does exp(-o^2w^2/2) = exp(-x^2/2o^2)?
the arrow...

What? It never says that anywhere. The question says to prove that,

\Phi(\omega) = exp(-\sigma^2 \omega^2 /2)

You must be misreading it because nowhere does it claim the thing you state.
 
tuanle007 said:
yeah.i understand that part..
but how does exp(-o^2w^2/2) = exp(-x^2/2o^2)?
the arrow...

It doesn't say that. It says that you are to prove that the [/b]characteristic function[/b] for the the Gaussian distribution is
e^{\frac{-\sigma^2\omega^2}{2}}[/itex]<br /> and them immediately uses the fact that the Gaussian distribution (with mean 0) itself can be written as <br /> e^{\frac{-x^2}{2\sigma^2}<br /> <br /> Those are two completely different functions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top