Deriving the Relation for Escape Velocity from a Proto-Star Cloud

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the escape velocity from a proto-star cloud with uniform density, mass M, and radius R. The initial calculation for the velocity when falling freely from the surface to the center is noted as "root over" GM/R, while the escape velocity is calculated as "root over" 2GM/R. Participants agree that the falling velocity and escape velocity should be symmetric, implying they are equal when considering motion from infinity to the center and vice versa. Clarification is requested on how to derive the original formula, emphasizing the relationship between potential energy and mass enclosed within a radius r. The conversation highlights the connection between falling and escape velocities in gravitational systems.
trina1990
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
: Derive a relation for the escape velocity of an object, launched from the center
of a proto-star cloud. The cloud has uniform density with the mass of M and radius R...
Ignore
collisions between the particles of the cloud and the launched object. If the object were
allowed to fall freely from the surface, it would reach the center with a velocity equal to
"root over" GM/R...

i ended up getting the velocity to be "root over" 2GM/R...
where's my fault?
& how to relalte the escape velocity with this falling velocity?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
trina1990 said:
i ended up getting the velocity to be "root over" 2GM/R...
where's my fault?
& how to relalte the escape velocity with this falling velocity?

I imagine that it is symmetric -- the speed achieved when "falling-in" to the centre from infinity (assuming starting from rest) is the same as the speed needed to escape to infinity from the centre. So you have the answer, you just have to derive it.

I think that the potential energy of the system when the object is at radius r just depends on the mass enclosed within radius r. Does that help?
 
yes...it makes sense to me that escape velocity & falling velocity is the same for the system...
but unfortunately i didn't get the 2nd para of your answer..
can you please provide me some more hints to derive the original formula given in the question?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top