Descending mass on rope attached to wheel

  • Thread starter Thread starter ConorDMK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Rope Wheel
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
13 replies · 7K views
ConorDMK
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A physics student of mass 57.0 kg is standing at the edge of the flat roof of a building, 12.0 m above the sidewalk. An unfriendly dog is running across the roof toward her. Next to her is a large wheel mounted on a horizontal axle at its center. The wheel, used to lift objects from the ground to the roof, has a light crank attached to it and a light rope wrapped around it; the free end of the rope hangs over the edge of the roof. The student grabs the end of the rope and steps off the roof.

a) If the wheel has radius 0.300 m and a moment of inertia of 9.60 kg⋅m2 for rotation about the axle, how long does it take her to reach the sidewalk? Ignore friction.

b) How fast will she be moving just before she lands? (I have not done anything for part b yet)

Homework Equations


I don't know if these are relevant, and I am sure I am missing some.

F=ma

ω=θ/t

v=ωr

θ=h/r

The Attempt at a Solution


As the person descends, there is a constant tension in the rope so the force acting on the person is
ΣF=ma=T-mg (Taking up as positive)

The height of the building is equal to the amount of rope required to descend, so the angle that the wheel must rotate through is
θ=h/r

and so the angular velocity of the wheel is
ω=h/(rt)

But this is where is cannot figure out where to go from here.
I did try to solve this with energy, but it kept giving me an incorrect answer.
The moment of inertia does suggest energy method though, but I cannot get it to work properly.
 
on Phys.org
ConorDMK said:
As the person descends, there is a constant tension in the rope so the force acting on the person is
ΣF=ma=T-mg (Taking up as positive)
OK, you've applied Newton's 2nd law to the person. Good!

Now do the same thing for the wheel. Then you'll be able to solve for the acceleration.
 
Doc Al said:
OK, you've applied Newton's 2nd law to the person. Good!

Now do the same thing for the wheel. Then you'll be able to solve for the acceleration.

Do you mean apply the rotational form of Newton's 2nd law? τ=Iα
 
ConorDMK said:
Do you mean apply the rotational form of Newton's 2nd law? τ=Iα
Absolutely.
 
Doc Al said:
Absolutely.

But we haven't been taught that yet, so I wouldn't know how torque works.
 
ConorDMK said:
But we haven't been taught that yet, so I wouldn't know how torque works.
No problem. Use conservation of energy.

You tried it and got the wrong answer, so show what you did. (One key is to properly relate the linear speed of the falling person to the angular speed of the turning wheel.)
 
Doc Al said:
No problem. Use conservation of energy.

You tried it and got the wrong answer, so show what you did. (One key is to properly relate the linear speed of the falling person to the angular speed of the turning wheel.)

Energy before:
Etotal=mgh

Energy after:
Etotal=0.5mv2+0.5Iω2

using ω=h/(rt) and v=2h/t

mgh=0.5m(2h/t)2+0.5I(h/(rt))2

t2=(2mh2+0.5I(h/r)2)/(mgh)

t=√[(2mh2+0.5I(h/r)2)/(mgh)]

Putting in the values

t=√[(2(57kg)(12m)2+0.5I(12m/0.3m)2)/((57kg)(9.8N/kg)(12m))]

t=1.90s to 2 decimal places (1.89596... s)

I don't know if this would be the answer if I had of used τ=Iα.
 
ConorDMK said:
Energy before:
Etotal=mgh

Energy after:
Etotal=0.5mv2+0.5Iω2
This is good.

ConorDMK said:
using ω=h/(rt) and v=2h/t
Why is there a factor of 2 in the expression for v, but not in the expression for ω?
 
Doc Al said:
This is good.Why is there a factor of 2 in the expression for v, but not in the expression for ω?

suvat: s=t(v+u)/2 as u=0 for both
v=2s/t

so v=2h/t and ω=2h/(rt)

Correct? or should they be without the 2?
 
ConorDMK said:
suvat: s=t(v+u)/2 as u=0 for both
v=2s/t

so v=2h/t and ω=2h/(rt)

Correct?
Correct!

ConorDMK said:
or should they be without the 2?
Nope, the 2 is correct.
 
Doc Al said:
Correct!Nope, the 2 is correct.

so if I continue with mgh=0.5m(2h/t)2+0.5I(2h/(rt))2 I should get the correct answer?
 
ConorDMK said:
so if I continue with mgh=0.5m(2h/t)2+0.5I(2h/(rt))2 I should get the correct answer?
Yes. Just solve for t.
 
Doc Al said:
Yes. Just solve for t.
t=√[(2(57kg)(12m)+2(9.6kgm2)(12m/0.3m)2)/((57kg)(9.8N/kg)(12m))]

t=2.65s
 
ConorDMK said:
t=√[(2(57kg)(12m)+2(9.6kgm2)(12m/0.3m)2)/((57kg)(9.8N/kg)(12m))]

t=2.65s
Looks good.