Moment of inertia of a wheel: linear to angular motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around measuring the moment of inertia of a wheel, focusing on the transition from linear to angular motion. The scenario involves a wheel mounted on frictionless bearings with a block hanging from a rope, leading to questions about the relationship between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy during the block's descent.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of energy conservation equations and kinematic relationships to calculate the moment of inertia. There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding acceleration and the forces acting on the system, particularly questioning the validity of assuming the acceleration to be equal to gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the need to consider the effects of the flywheel's inertia on the system's acceleration. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in the energy distribution between the falling mass and the rotating wheel, with some participants suggesting experimental checks to validate theoretical assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, including the absence of friction and the specific setup of the wheel and block system. The discussion reflects on the implications of these constraints for the calculations being performed.

archaeosite
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



You are asked to measure the moment of inertia of a large wheel for rotation about an axis perpendicular to the wheel at its center. You measure the diameter of the wheel to be 0.600 m. Then you mount the wheel on frictionless bearings on a horizontal frictionless axle at the center of the wheel. You wrap a light rope around the wheel and hang an 8.20-kg block of wood from the free end of the rope. You release the system from rest and find that the block descends 12.0 m in 4.00 s.

Homework Equations



K1 + U1 = K2 + U2
K = 1/2*m*v2
K = 1/2*I*omega2
v2 = v02+2a(x-x0)
v = r*omega

The Attempt at a Solution



Variables:
d = 0.600 m
r = 0.300 m
m = 8.20 kg
v0 = 0 m/s
omega0 = 0 rad/s
change in x = 12.0 m
t = 4.00s

The initial kinetic energy is zero and the final gravitational PE is 0, so we use the equation U1 = K2, which is:

mgh = 1/2*m*v2 + 1/2*I*omega2
mgh - 1/2*m*v2 = 1/2*I*omega2
(mgh - 1/2*m*v2)/(1/2*omega2) = I

To solve, we need the linear velocity. I used a kinematic equation to calculate the velocity.

v2 = v02+2a(x-x0)
v2 = 0 + 2(9.81 m/s2)(12.0 m)
v2 = 235.44 m2/s2
v = 15.34 m/s

Then, v = r*omega
omega = v/r
omega = (15.34 m/s)/(0.300 m)
omega = 51.15 rad/s

Now back to the energy equation.

I = (mgh - 1/2*m*v2)/(1/2*omega2)

I = ((8.20kg)(9.81 m/s2)(12.0 m) - 1/2*(8.20 kg)*(15.34 m/s)2)/(1/2*(51.15 rad/s)2)

I = 5.35*10-6

But my homework site says this is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
v2 = 0 + 2(9.81 m/s2)(12.0 m)
... you have an unjustified assumption - the acceleration cannot be 1g.
 
Simon Bridge said:
... you have an unjustified assumption - the acceleration cannot be 1g.

But why not? There is no friction on the wheel from its bearing or mounting, and so the only external force acting on the block is gravity...?
 
archaeosite said:
o solve, we need the linear velocity. I used a kinematic equation to calculate the velocity.

v2 = v02+2a(x-x0)
v2 = 0 + 2(9.81 m/s2)(12.0 m)
v2 = 235.44 m2/s2
v = 15.34 m/s
check this equation ...the mass is hanging ut your equation is representing free fall!
v is related to w (omega) try to find the angular velocity ?
 
Ah, I see what you mean.

Now I've solved it. And as a courtesy to future answer-seekers, here's how.

Use the kinematic equation delta-x = 0.5(v0-v)t

12.0 m = 0.5*v*4.0 s
v = 6.00 m/s

then, omega = 20.0 rad/s

Plugged into the energy equation above, I = 4.09 kg*m2
 
Well done.
The explanation you are looking for is that gravity does not just act on the hanging mass alone - it also has to accelerate the flywheel (via the string).
It's just like when you pull a block across a table by attaching a hanging mass - you work it out by free body diagrams.

You were halfway there with the energy description:
You had already written that some of the change in PE gets stored as rotation in the flywheel and some as kinetic energy in the falling weight.
If the weight were in freefall, all of the change in PE would go for it's kinetic energy ... so, with the flywheel attached, it should be slower.

You can also check experimentally that a weight off a wheel falls slower than unattached - or that a yoyo falls slower when unwinding than it does if you just drop it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: archaeosite
Simon Bridge said:
Well done.
The explanation you are looking for is that gravity does not just act on the hanging mass alone - it also has to accelerate the flywheel (via the string).
It's just like when you pull a block across a table by attaching a hanging mass - you work it out by free body diagrams.

You were halfway there with the energy description:
You had already written that some of the change in PE gets stored as rotation in the flywheel and some as kinetic energy in the falling weight.
If the weight were in freefall, all of the change in PE would go for it's kinetic energy ... so, with the flywheel attached, it should be slower.

You can also check experimentally that a weight off a wheel falls slower than unattached - or that a yoyo falls slower when unwinding than it does if you just drop it.
Thank you for the explanation. Your second paragraph especially helped!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Simon Bridge

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K