Describe some basic concepts for me please?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Telephone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concepts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding key concepts related to star formation, particularly stellar output, HII fraction, and supernova dynamics. Stellar output, or absolute luminosity, correlates with a star's mass, as more massive stars release energy at a higher rate due to increased core pressure and fusion activity. The HII fraction refers to ionized hydrogen in regions of star formation, which is crucial for understanding stellar environments. For supernovae, various mechanisms exist, and resources like Wikipedia can provide detailed explanations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of these concepts in astrophysics and encourages further inquiry.
Telephone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is in the wrong section, but its not really homework, just curiosity.

I'm a high school student struggling to understand a paper given to me, and search engines don't provide good starting points unless I have a more exact search query.

The research is on star formation, investigating factors such as ionization pressure, radiation pressure and supernovae. Now some questions..

Could someone explain stellar output? Does it have to do with heat or luminosity, and would it have any correlation to the mass of the star?
Could someone also explain what HII fraction would be? Does it have to do with diffuse fraction (or reflection)? I believe it is ionized hydrogen, but I'm not sure about anything else.
Also, would anyone have a good starting point for understanding the dynamics of supernovae?
Sharing any general knowledge on these topics would be great too!

Thanks in advance!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Telephone said:
... its not really homework, just curiosity.
...

Could someone explain stellar output? Does it have to do with heat or luminosity, and would it have any correlation to the mass of the star?
...

It doesn't sound like homework. I think you are in the right general area but perhaps more precisely you want to ask this in ASTROPHYSICS. Astrophysics deals with the physics of individual stars (among other things) while Cosmology is about the overall evolution of the universe as a whole. There's not an absolute sharp division, but your questions are all about individual stars.

Probabably by "output" you mean what is technically called the [absolute] luminosity. Basically that is the "wattage" of the star---the total amount of energy it releases per second.

As you suggest it might, the output DOES correlate with the mass. Typically, for most of its lifetime, since the more massive a star is the more pressure in its core (where the fusion happens), the hotter and faster it "burns" in its core. So typically more fusion energy is released per second, in a more massive star.

That enhanced power output in the core percolates out to the surface. So the more massive the star is the hotter its surface gets, and the more radiantly it glows.

I'm not using formal technically correct language---just telling you how I think about it, in my own words.

I hope someone with more detailed knowledge answers with specifics! There are some equations relating mass to luminosity. I don't happen to know them by heart, so hopefully some more knowledgeable person will step in. As a last resort you could try googling "wikipedia star mass luminosity" or something like that.

Also, wikipedia is good on the different mechanisms of supernova explosion. There are different ways that supernovas happen---it's pretty interesting. Keep asking questions. :biggrin:
 
That really helped a lot! thanks so much!
Don't worry, I'll be back =D
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top