Design a Vehicle: Create a Realistic, Practical, User-Friendly 3-in-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Vehicle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of designing a vehicle that can operate in land, sea, and air environments. Participants explore various ideas, challenges, and practical considerations related to creating such a multi-functional vehicle, including user-friendliness, cost, and practicality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the necessity of a vehicle that operates in all three environments, suggesting that if it can fly, land and sea capabilities may be redundant.
  • Others propose that hovercrafts or wing-in-ground-effect crafts could serve as practical all-terrain vehicles, highlighting their ability to float if they lose power.
  • A participant mentions a specific design for a hovercraft that can carry 2-4 passengers and includes advanced navigational controls.
  • There are discussions about the challenges of flying submarines, with some expressing nostalgia for fictional representations in media.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality and safety of flying cars, including noise pollution and potential hazards to pedestrians.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the feasibility of combining land, sea, and air capabilities in a single vehicle, citing safety and design challenges.
  • A humorous suggestion is made about a vehicle that can perform multiple extreme activities, such as swimming and skydiving.
  • Links to existing concepts of flying cars and airships are shared, with varying opinions on their practicality and safety.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the practicality or necessity of a vehicle that operates in all three environments. Multiple competing views and ideas remain, with some advocating for specific designs while others express skepticism about their feasibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about the capabilities and limitations of different vehicle designs, including safety concerns, regulatory issues, and the practicality of operation in urban environments. The discussion includes references to existing vehicles and concepts, but no definitive conclusions are drawn.

  • #31
Ivan Seeking said:
I heard recently that they expect to get FAA approval this year. Up to now I don't think they have been allowed to fly without a tether.
I wonder how much noise that flying-car makes. I can't see that in downtown with the airwash blowing on pedestrians.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
I seriously expect that they'll be restricted to something like 50' minumum altitude and use rooftop parking the same way that helicopters do now.
 
  • #33
Danger said:
Oh great, Ivan... just friggin' great! Now he's going to be whining for a week about "why didn't I invent that?"

Fttt, my latest invention uses lay line power, way ahead of any thing you guys have.:smile:
 
  • #34
wolram said:
Fttt, my latest invention uses lay line power, way ahead of any thing you guys have.:smile:
My arse! You never would have even heard of that if you hadn't stolen it from the Norweeds.
 
  • #35
Danger said:
My arse! You never would have even heard of that if you hadn't stolen it from the Norweeds.

Beg your pardon old chaps but the leys were a wikan discovery past on to the druids, and there power rediscovered by me.
 
  • #36
Yeah, and everybody knows that the Druids were Norweedish. Sheesh! Where did you study history? :rolleyes:
 
  • #37
Danger said:
Yeah, and everybody knows that the Druids were Norweedish. Sheesh! Where did you study history? :rolleyes:


I bet you can not twidle your thumbs like i can.
 
  • #38
"Do you twiddle your thumb at me Sir?"
 
  • #39
wolram said:
I bet you can not twidle your thumbs like i can.
I have better things to twiddle, thank you very much.

3trQN said:
"Do you twiddle your thumb at me Sir?"
And the fight is on... :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 244 ·
9
Replies
244
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K