Designing the Fastest Ramp for a Ball: Solving a Challenging Physics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter jinkm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Ramp
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the brachistochrone problem, which involves designing a frictionless elliptical ramp that allows a ball to travel down and then back up to its original height in the shortest time. The key focus is on deriving the equation that defines the optimal shape of the ramp under the influence of gravity, specifically 9.8 m/s². Participants highlight the complexity of the problem, emphasizing that it is not as straightforward as it may seem. The challenge lies in balancing the gravitational forces and the ramp's curvature to achieve the fastest descent and ascent. Ultimately, the goal is to find a mathematical solution that encapsulates these dynamics effectively.
jinkm
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I bumped into this physicis problem about 2 weeks ago and it is much harder than you might think:

A ball is dropped down a frictionless ramp an eliptical ramp. It must travel down the ramp and then back up the ramp to its original height 10 meters away. What is the equation that defines the fastest ramp for the ball?

Assume the only force acting on the ball is gravity - 9.8 m/s.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top