Designing with Thermal expansion in mind

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on designing a tubular probe made of stainless steel 304, which has a thermal expansion coefficient of approximately 9.6 x10^-6 in/in/F. The user expresses concern about filling the tube with an epoxy that has a significantly higher thermal expansion coefficient of 21 x10^-6 in/in/F, potentially leading to stress and failure. A suggestion is made to use Sylgard as a buffer material to mitigate the effects of differing thermal expansions between the epoxy and stainless steel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal expansion coefficients
  • Knowledge of materials science, specifically regarding stainless steel and epoxy
  • Familiarity with RoHS compliance in materials
  • Experience with mechanical design and stress analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of Sylgard as a buffering material
  • Explore alternative epoxies with thermal expansion coefficients closer to that of stainless steel 304
  • Study the effects of thermal expansion in confined spaces and how it impacts material integrity
  • Learn about RoHS-compliant materials suitable for high-temperature applications
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, materials scientists, and product designers involved in the development of thermal-sensitive applications, particularly those working with stainless steel and epoxy materials.

_Bd_
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am trying to design a tubular probe that's made of stainless steel (304), from what I've read it has a Thermal expansion coefficient of around 9.6 x10^-6 in/in/F give or take on the quality.

I want to fill this tube halfway with an Epoxy, however from what I've read this epoxy has a thermal expansion coefficient of 21 x10^-6 in/in/F

This is more than twice as much expansion, and I'm worried that it will create stress in the part and might even break it.

However, what I want to know is if the expansion would happen side-ways given that it will be inside the tube and taking the shape of the container, I would hope that it would expand upwards mostly, since it would be limited on all other sides. I am not too sure about how things expand when restrictions are applied.

Please advice and thank you!

(Also if you know of some other epoxy that's RoHS and closer to the coefficient of SS that would help as well)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
_Bd_ said:
Hi, I am trying to design a tubular probe that's made of stainless steel (304), from what I've read it has a Thermal expansion coefficient of around 9.6 x10^-6 in/in/F give or take on the quality.

I want to fill this tube halfway with an Epoxy, however from what I've read this epoxy has a thermal expansion coefficient of 21 x10^-6 in/in/F

This is more than twice as much expansion, and I'm worried that it will create stress in the part and might even break it.

However, what I want to know is if the expansion would happen side-ways given that it will be inside the tube and taking the shape of the container, I would hope that it would expand upwards mostly, since it would be limited on all other sides. I am not too sure about how things expand when restrictions are applied.

Please advice and thank you!

(Also if you know of some other epoxy that's RoHS and closer to the coefficient of SS that would help as well)

Depending on the application, you can use a buffer material between the epoxy and the SS to absorb the difference in thermal expansion. We have used Sylgard for this application in the past with good results (it's a softer polymer that is used for mechanical buffering in electronic applications):

http://www.dowcorning.com/applications/search/products/details.aspx?prod=01064291
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K