Destructive Interference of a sheet of mica

AI Thread Summary
To achieve destructive interference for light reflecting off a mica sheet on glass, the thickness of the mica must be calculated using the formula t = (wavelength/n)/4. For a wavelength of 420 nm in air and a refractive index of 1.5 for mica, the thickness should be t = (420 nm / 1.5) / 4, resulting in a thickness of 70 nm. The confusion arose from incorrectly using the refractive index of glass instead of mica in the calculations. The key point is that the thickness must ensure that the optical path difference between the two reflecting rays leads to destructive interference. Proper application of the formulas is essential for accurate results.
conniechiwa
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sheet of mica sits on glass (n = 1.8). How thick should the sheet of mica (n = 1.5) be if it is to be as thin as possible and still give rise to destructive interference for reflection of light in the blue part of the spectrum (use l = 420 nm)? (All parts of the mica except the bottom surface are still surrounded by air.)


Homework Equations


1/2 + 2t/(wavelength/n) = m
2t/(wavelength/n) = 1/2
t = (wavelength/n)/4


The Attempt at a Solution


t = (wavelength/n)/4
t = (420nm/1.8/)4
t = 58.3 nm

I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi conniechiwa,

conniechiwa said:

Homework Statement


A sheet of mica sits on glass (n = 1.8). How thick should the sheet of mica (n = 1.5) be if it is to be as thin as possible and still give rise to destructive interference for reflection of light in the blue part of the spectrum (use l = 420 nm)? (All parts of the mica except the bottom surface are still surrounded by air.)


Homework Equations


1/2 + 2t/(wavelength/n) = m
2t/(wavelength/n) = 1/2
t = (wavelength/n)/4


The Attempt at a Solution


t = (wavelength/n)/4
t = (420nm/1.8/)4
t = 58.3 nm

I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong...

The interference comes about from considering two rays of light: one reflects off the air/mica interface (not entering the mica), and the other enters the mica and reflects off the mica/glass interface.

The n in the formula is due to the fact that the wavelength in the mica is smaller than the wavelength in air. Do you see what you did wrong in the above work?
 
Yeah I get it now. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top