Destructive interference Problem

AI Thread Summary
Two point sources, A and B, generate sinusoidal waves in water, creating points of destructive interference along the line joining them. The sources are 6.0 cm apart, with the nearest points of destructive interference occurring at 0.6 cm and 2.2 cm from source A. The wavelength of the water waves is determined to be 3.2 cm, leading to a total of four points of destructive interference along the line AB. These points are located at 0.6 cm, 2.2 cm, 3.8 cm, and 5.4 cm from source A. The problem illustrates the application of the superposition principle in wave interference.
patrickmoloney
Messages
94
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



two point sources A and B generate sinusoidal waves in a water surface. The sources are 6.0 cm apart and vibrate in phase with the same amplitude and frequency. Points of destructive interference are observed on AB, the line joining the two sources. the two nearest such points to source A occur 0.6 cm and 2.2 cm from it. determine the wavelength of the water waves. How many points of destructive interference are there in total along the line AB

Homework Equations



y1= Asin(kx1-ωt+ \Phi )

y2= Asin(kx2-ωt+ \Phi )

Superposition Principle : y= y1+y2

y= 2A[sin(kx1+kx2/2-ωt+ \Phi )cos(kx1-kx2/2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Have no idea. I've been at it for ages..my attempts have conjured up nothing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From a PM exchange -- Patrick has made progress on this question...

patrickmoloney said:
I know that path difference between 2 nodes is one wavelength, perhaps if A goes to b you increase distance by 1.6 cm? of and then decrease B from A by 1.6 cm. Then add these two distances and that is the wavelenght? Thanks a million! You helped me solve it. Wavelength is 3.2 cm with 4 points of destructive interference, of course! How could I have been so dumb.. 0.6, 2.2, 3.8 and 5.4 ...it all makes sense now. Thank you again.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top