Details of logarithmic calculations?

AI Thread Summary
Logarithmic calculations, such as finding values like log(2) = 0.3010, can be derived using methods like Taylor's Series. This series provides an approximation for natural logarithms (ln) within a specific range, though it converges slowly. The discussion highlights the desire for clarity on how these logarithmic values are determined and the mathematical foundations behind them. Additionally, there is interest in understanding the calculation of cosine values, which can also be approached through series expansions. Overall, the conversation seeks to demystify the processes behind logarithmic and trigonometric calculations.
kiru
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
From where I can get the details of lograthmic calculations?How the values are found?and on what basis?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you want to know for instance how \log{3} is found? That kind of calculation?
 
Jameson said:
Do you want to know for instance how \log{3} is found? That kind of calculation?
Actually I want to know this:We know that log{2} is 0.3010.How it is calculated?
 
kiru said:
Actually I want to know this:We know that log{2} is 0.3010.How it is calculated?

I would have the same question + how cosines are calculated.
 
There are a variety of ways.

The simplest is to use "Taylor's Series". It can be shown, in Calculus, that for x between 0 and 2, ln(x)= (x-1)- (1/2)(x-1)2+ (1/3)(x-1)3-...- ((-1)n/n)(x-1)n+... That infinite series does not converge very fast but it will give close to the correct value eventually.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top