Detecting changes in incidence rate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gerenuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incidence Rate
AI Thread Summary
To detect changes in the incidence rate of rare events, statistical tools like moving averages and linear regression models are recommended, depending on the nature of the data. The Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) method is highlighted for analyzing trends, as demonstrated in a study on dengue fever. It's important to consider the temporal profile of the data, whether it shows isolated spikes or sustained trends. Additionally, controlling for confounding factors and minimizing beta error is crucial, especially in public safety contexts. Ultimately, a combination of statistical analysis and visual inspection may provide the best insights into the data trends.
Gerenuk
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
5
Hi!
I have rare events over time (about 200 incidences) and I'd like to detect when the time rate of these increase, i.e. at which point more events per time start to occur.
Do you know a solid statistical tool to analyze that? I'd also like to know if the change is real evidence or just random.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gerenuk said:
Hi!
I have rare events over time (about 200 incidences) and I'd like to detect when the time rate of these increase, i.e. at which point more events per time start to occur.
Do you know a solid statistical tool to analyze that? I'd also like to know if the change is real evidence or just random.

It's somewhat dependent on the temporal profile: isolated random spikes, periodic spikes or waves, or sustained trends. Generally, various applications of moving averages are often used. These are fairly robust and can be adapted to different profiles. You can look up "Moving Average" on the Wiki for a fairly good general discussion. Linear regression models also work well for more sustained trends where you want to test for trends greater or less than 0.

The following paper shows an application of a combined approach called Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) for dengue fever.

http://www.ajtmh.org/content/79/6/933.full.pdf

EDIT: As an aside, sometimes just inspection is more appropriate than statistical testing if public safety is an issue. You really want to minimize beta error (missing a trend that actually exists). You also will need to control for confounding factors. Differences in reporting and/or detection over time is often the case.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Thanks a lot! I hope I can make use of the information.

My data is most likely something like a constant rate up to some time and then an increase in frequency. The problem is that it is only about 200 events in total.

For regression I'm afraid it won't tell me if the trend is with the confidence interval. But I need to read more about it...
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top