Detecting Initial Singularity with Cosmological Tests - Szydlowski et al.

In summary, the authors of the paper "Can the initial singularity be detected by cosmological tests?" discuss the possibility of detecting the initial cosmological singularity through cosmological tests. They explore the idea of a bouncing model, where the singularity is replaced with a bounce, and use data from distant type Ia supernovae to constrain this model. They find that this model can be ruled out on a $4\sigma$ confidence level and that the cosmological constant does not support the bouncing term. They also mention the possibility of using other observational tests like the cosmic microwave background and the age of the universe's oldest objects. However, their model does not connect with Loop Quantum Cosmology.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
http://rainman.astro.uiuc.edu/coffeepap_Friday.html

astro-ph/0504464
Title: Can the initial singularity be detected by cosmological tests?
Authors: Marek Szydlowski, Wlodzimierz Godlowski, Adam Krawiec, Jacek Golbiak
Comments: 30 pages, 7 figures

In the present paper we raise the question whether initial cosmological singularity can be proved from the cosmological tests. The classical general relativity predict the existence of singularity in the past if only some energy conditions are satisfied. On the other hand the latest quantum gravity applications to cosmology suggest of possibility of avoiding the singularity and replace it with the bounce. The distant type Ia supernovae data are used to constraints on bouncing evolutional scenario where square of the Hubble function $H^2$ is given by formulae $H^2=H^2_0[\Omega_{m,0}(1+z)^{m}-\Omega_{n,0}(1+z)^{n}]$, where $\Omega_{m,0}, \Omega_{n,0}>0$ are density parameters and $n>m>0$. We show that the on the base of the SNIa data standard bouncing models can be ruled out on the $4\sigma$ confidence level. If we add the cosmological constant to the standard bouncing model then we obtain as the best-fit that the parameter $\Omega_{n,0}$ is equal zero which means that the SNIa data do not support the bouncing term in the model. The bounce term is statistically insignificant the present epoch. We also demonstrate that BBN offer the possibility of obtaining stringent constraints of the extra term $\Omega_{n,0}$. The other observational test methods like CMB and the age of oldest objects in the Universe are used. We also use the Akaike informative criterion to select a model according to the goodness of fit and we conclude that this term should be ruled out by Occam's razor, which makes that the big bang is favored rather then bouncing scenario.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I notice that even though they don't connect with Loop Quantum Cosmology (their "bouncing model" given in their equation (1) is different from LQC) they at least mention Bojowald's work in their conclusions.

So at least they are aware of it. But their paper does not bear on LQG. They are studying a "bouncing model", as in eqn. (1), which behaves differently and from which the conclusions do not apply. It is too bad if one gets the impression from some verbal suggestions that it has something to do with Loop, but one can see from their equations, both in the paper itself, and also already in the abstract, that it doesnt.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I read that paper yesterday and did not find it very convincing. Out of curiosity I browsed through some other works by Szydlowski. He is no stranger to unconventional theories.
 

1. What is the initial singularity and why is it important?

The initial singularity is a hypothetical point in time at the beginning of the universe where the universe was infinitely dense and infinitely small. It is important because it is the starting point of the universe and understanding it can help us understand the origin and evolution of the universe.

2. What is the significance of using cosmological tests to detect the initial singularity?

Cosmological tests, such as measuring the expansion rate of the universe or the cosmic microwave background radiation, can provide evidence for the existence of the initial singularity. This can help us validate or refine current theories about the origin and evolution of the universe.

3. How does the study by Szydlowski et al. contribute to our understanding of the initial singularity?

Szydlowski et al. proposed a new method for detecting the initial singularity using cosmological tests. They showed that by analyzing the behavior of certain cosmological parameters, such as the Hubble constant and the density parameter, we can determine if the initial singularity exists and make predictions about its properties.

4. What are the limitations of using cosmological tests to detect the initial singularity?

One limitation is that current cosmological models do not include the effects of quantum gravity, which may be necessary to fully understand the initial singularity. Additionally, the accuracy and precision of cosmological measurements may also affect the reliability of detecting the initial singularity.

5. How can the detection of the initial singularity impact future research in cosmology?

If the initial singularity is confirmed by cosmological tests, it can provide valuable insights and constraints for developing new theories and models of the universe. It may also open up new avenues for research in areas such as quantum gravity and the nature of the early universe.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
897
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top