I Determinant of a specific, symmetric Toeplitz matrix

Rlwe
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Calculation of a ratio of determinants for a family of specific, symmetric Toeplitz matrices
Let us define matrix ##\mathbf{B}_n=[b_{ij}]_{n\times n}## as follows $$[b_{ij}]_{n\times n}:=\begin{cases} b_{ij} = \alpha\,,\quad j=i\\ b_{ij}=\beta\,,\quad j=i\pm1\\ b_{ij}=1\,,\quad \text{else}\end{cases}\,,$$ where ##\alpha\,,\beta\in\mathbb{R}## and ##n\geq2##. ##\mathbf{B}_4##, for example, looks like this $$\mathbf{B}_4=\begin{bmatrix} \alpha & \beta & 1 & 1 \\ \beta & \alpha & \beta & 1\\ 1 & \beta & \alpha &\beta \\ 1 & 1& \beta& \alpha \end{bmatrix}\,.$$ Is there any simple, closed form expression for a ratio of determinants ##\frac{\det(\mathbf{B}_n)}{\det(\mathbf{B}_{n-1})}##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not a simple one: I think you can only write out the determinant with all summands and factors and make that your formula. I doubt anything cancels out (tried a few low dimensional examples).
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top