Determination of dominance or recessiveness

  • Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date

nomadreid

Gold Member
1,317
110
Summary
In pairs of alleles subject to the dominant/recessive distinction, can one determine a priori which one will be dominant?
Suppose you have two new alleles whose combination (gene) determine a certain trait, but the trait associated with only one of the alleles (i.e., those which can be compared as dominant/recessive). Of course the classic way, going back to Mendel, was to mix them and see what came out (statistically). But assuming one can sequence each allele before they are mixed (we are assuming that we don't know the outcome), can one, only by looking at the two sequences, determine which one will be determinant relative to the other? (As is certainly clear from my question, I am not a biologist, so the question is on a layman level.)
 

BillTre

Science Advisor
Gold Member
2018 Award
1,148
1,960
This might work with some traits, but probably not all.

The important thing is what the trait is. Some, like the trait of carrying a specific sequence (a molecular trait) will be obviously dominant, since if you can detect the sequence in a heterozygote, it will be a dominant trait.

Other traits, of course, can be much more complex, like eye color.
Many genes affect eye color, with lots of subtle differences, in eye colors as phenotypes.
If the process generating a trait is not fully understood, or if the functioning of the gene with the sequence variants is not fully understood within the process of generating eye color, then it will be correspondingly more difficult to predict what a particular sequence difference will have on a phenotype. Seems unlikely to be successful to me for most fairly complex phenotypes.

This is assuming that the rest of the genome is fully understood and that sequence variants of other genes in the genome won't interact with the mutation differently. The sequence variance of other (possibly interacting) genes would add another level of prediction difficulty.

Making crosses or looking a family lineages vs. the distributing of the sequence variants would be easier.
From a experiemental point of view, you might have a cycle of hypothesizing what phenotype a sequence difference might result in, generating in some way an organism with the sequence variant, observe the result and determine if your prediction is actually predictive.
 
1
4
I think the best answer is No. Dominance is not easily predicted. For most genes we can't even predict whether the resulting protein will even be functional. Determining how two alleles will interact to produce the organism's phenotype is currently way beyond our capabilities. (Hi Bill)
 

nomadreid

Gold Member
1,317
110
Thanks very much, Bill and Rick.
 

epenguin

Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,533
634
Your question is logical in the framework of the logic of causation. This is how these things may have to be presented to laypersons when you want to tell them something in a short time, because if you tell it in terms of the logic of discovery and what lead to the understanding that you are putting over, it is often a much longer story.

The logic of discovery has been the other way round from how you put it. The discovery of many mutations comes from the fact that a deleterious mutation, causing for example synthesis of a non-functional enzyme or other protein, is deleterious to the whole organism, and it is because of that it is first noticed. In the case that the protein is a human one (which is a large proportion of those studied ) it is a poorly functioning but not completely non-functioning protein that gets noticed, as it may be not totally incompatible with life but giving rise to a disease. Ones totally incompatible with life can easily not be noticed if heterozygotes are healthy and homozygotes never born. (In micro organisms you often conveniently do not have the diploid complication; the researcher can find haploid organisms mutant in an enzyme of a biosynthetic pathways, e.g. that of an amino acid by finding ones unable to grow unless supplied with that aminoacid.)

Starting around the middle 80s, researchers are in "protein engineering" able to synthesise genes with designedly altered nucleotide sequences, hence may make proteins with designed altered amino acid sequences at will. If you know the structure of the protein, and particularly that of the binding or catalytic site, you can try to predict the effect of changing the amino acid sequence.This prediction can be anything between a reasonable conjecture (certain changes will pretty obviously disrupt binding or catalysis) to a very advanced attempt at computer calculation of the folding of the protein. And so to some small extent what you suggest is actually done, but it is less as an instrument of prediction than a check up and way of improving our increasing prediction abilities.

I hope this is understandable, every sentence here would really require further explanations.That explains why it is easier to explain starting with the conclusions than how you get to them! Yours is also a good question it has made me realise questions that I do not know the answer to and I do not know if anyone does.
 
Last edited:

nomadreid

Gold Member
1,317
110
Thanks very much, epenguin. Very helpful.
I am well familiar with the fact that scientific and mathematical topics have two opposing ways of being introduced: (a) chronologically, as they were developed in history, and (b) logically. It is rare that (a) and (b) coincide.
I am also well familiar with the fact that there is a fine line between the amount of simplification needed to present an explanation for a lay audience and oversimplification to the point of falsehood. Your answer kept on the good side of that line, as far as I can tell.
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Determination of dominance or recessiveness" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Determination of dominance or recessiveness

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top