Determine if point lies on inscribed square

ged25
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
How do you determine if a point lies on the sides of a square inscribed on a circle ?
I'm given only the radius of the circle and the circle is centered at the origin.
My idea was to find the equation for each side and then to test the given point.
However, I just realized that you can inscribe a square in many different ways.
I'm stumped on how to do this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you mean "determine if a point lies on A certain square" or on a specific square? If you need to prove the last, then you really need some more information.

The first question is a bit more fun. Try to see it intuitively first. Draw an inscribed square and mentally change the square to another inscribed square. You will see that you get a second (smaller) circle. Points lying inside the circle do not belong to a inscribed square, and points lying inbetween the cricles do belong to a insribed square.
The only thing you need to do now is to find the radius of the circle.

I'm sorry if you understood nothing of what I tried to describe, but it's hard to explain. I suggest download the free program geogebra and play a bit with it. You'll see very soon what I mean...
 
Its the first question.
I do not understand how you can get a smaller circle when you shift the square. Maybe I'm doing it wrong but I thought that when you shift the square, the end points of the square move along the circle. The diagonals of the square will be equal to the diameter of the circle and will remain the same regardless of the square is drawn.
 
You don't shift the square, but you rotate the square. But perhaps you meant that.
It's true that the endpoints of the square will still lie on the circle, but the sides of the square will create an inscribed circle. The side of every inscribed square will be a tangent line to this inscribed circle. This fact would make it easy to find an equation for this circle...
 
Ok, I get it now. I seem to vaguely remember an animation that showed this.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top