Determine Kp for N2(g) + 3H2 (g) \Updownarrow 2NH3(g)

AI Thread Summary
To determine Kp for the reaction N2(g) + 3H2(g) ⇌ 2NH3(g), the user discusses the need to manipulate given reactions, applying Hess's Law principles. They acknowledge that flipping reactions changes the sign of Kp and that multiplying reactions affects Kp exponentially. The user expresses uncertainty about how to correctly calculate Kp for the target reaction using the provided Kp values. They conclude that combining the reactions appropriately will yield the desired Kp, while also noting potential errors in the latex formatting of the reactions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between Kp values in reaction manipulation.
312213
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


H2 (g) + Cl2(g) \Updownarrow 2HCl (g) Kp = 2.5 × 1033
NH3(g) + HCl(g) \Updownarrow NH4Cl(s) Kp = 2.1 × 1015
N2(g) + 4H2(g) +Cl2 \Updownarrow 2NH4Cl(s) Kp = 3.9 × 1070

Determine the Kp for N2(g) + 3H2 (g) \Updownarrow 2NH3(g).

Homework Equations


Don't know/none


The Attempt at a Solution


In order to get to N2(g) + 3H2 (g) \Updownarrow 2NH3(g), I would have to multiple/flip equations so that they result in the desired reaction set.
-(H2 (g) + Cl2(g) \Updownarrow 2HCl (g) Kp = 2.5 × 1033)
-2(NH3(g) + HCl(g) \Updownarrow NH4Cl(s) Kp = 2.1 × 1015)
N2(g) + 4H2(g) +Cl2 \Updownarrow 2NH4Cl(s) Kp = 3.9 × 1070

These would cancel out to the desired reaction.

In Hess's Law, I understand that multiplying a step would mean its enthalpy gets multiplied by that number. If I flip a step, its enthalpy would inverse its sign.

In voltage calculation from standard reduction potentials, reversing the sign would inverse the potential for the step but multiplying the step does not affect the potential.

Originally I would just follow Hess's Law to calculate but I never did this for Kp and so I'm not sure the answer would be correct. How do I approach this problem and solving for Kp.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just combine these reactions so that everything cancels out - you will be left with Kp=f(Kp1,Kp2,Kp3) (indices just to signal these are constants for each reaction given). That's all.
 
Ok thanks.

On a side note, I think the latex reference for some of the arrows are wrong.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top