Determine period for off center disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the period of a horizontally suspended disk with a rod bored through it at a distance from the center. The moment of inertia is calculated using the formula I = 1/2 ma^2 + md^2. A participant suggests using the relationship between angular acceleration (alpha), torque (T), and moment of inertia (I) to derive the period. They propose that the period can be approximated as π√((a^2 + d^2)/g*d). Confirmation of this expression is requested from others in the discussion.
boardaddict
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A disk of mass m and radius a is suspended horizontally by a rod bored through the disk at a location d distance from the center. When in equilibrium the center of the disk is directly below the rod. Obtain an approximate expression for the period, ignore disapative effects

Homework Equations



per Newtonian

I = 1/2 mr^2 + md^2
I*theta: = -mg(rsin(theta))


The Attempt at a Solution


1/2 ma^2 +md^2

Im missing something simple here...If someone could point me in the right direction it would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
boardaddict said:

Homework Statement



A disk of mass m and radius a is suspended horizontally by a rod bored through the disk at a location d distance from the center. When in equilibrium the center of the disk is directly below the rod. Obtain an approximate expression for the period, ignore disapative effects

Homework Equations



per Newtonian

I = 1/2 mr^2 + md^2
I*theta: = -mg(rsin(theta))


The Attempt at a Solution


1/2 ma^2 +md^2

Im missing something simple here...If someone could point me in the right direction it would be appreciated

Wait, can I use alpha= to T/I , then relate that to 2pi to find period?
 
boardaddict said:
Wait, can I use alpha= to T/I , then relate that to 2pi to find period?

If I did this right I get ;

pi((a^2)+d^2)/g*d

If someone would confirm that would be great
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top