How Do You Determine the Heat of Reaction for CO + NO2 Reaction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter richi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The heat of reaction for the CO + NO2 reaction can be determined using the activation energy of 135 kJ/mol for the forward reaction. To find the heat of reaction, one must consider the enthalpy change associated with the products and reactants. The activation energy for the reverse reaction can be calculated by adding the heat of reaction to the activation energy of the forward reaction. Resources, such as the provided link, can assist in understanding the calculation of reaction enthalpy. Understanding kinetics and how to manipulate equations is crucial for solving these types of problems.
richi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Can somebody help me with this please?

CO + NO2 ----> CO2 + NO the activation energy for the forward reaction is 135 kJ/mol of CO reacted.
a) determine the heat of reaction
b) fron the data given , and the Delta Hr for the reaction , determine the activation energy for the reverse reaction.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any ideas about the problem? Do you remember Kinetics and flipping equations and what was involved there?
 
Stevedye56 said:
Do you have any ideas about the problem? Do you remember Kinetics and flipping equations and what was involved there?

I know the molecules in the reaction need 135kJ to start the reaction. But when determining heat of reaction, the number is not even close to 135 kJ.
 
This site has some good information on calculating the reaction enthalpy. http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c120/heatreac.html
 
richi said:
I know the molecules in the reaction need 135kJ to start the reaction. But when determining heat of reaction, the number is not even close to 135 kJ.

Thanks it is helpful.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top