Determine the potential energy function of the charged particle

AI Thread Summary
To determine the potential energy function of a charged particle, one must integrate the force function f(x) and take the negative of that integral, resulting in U(x). The problem emphasizes stating any assumptions, particularly regarding the nature of the charge distribution. For an infinitely long linear charge, the potential cannot be defined as zero at infinity due to its uniformity from any distance. The discussion suggests considering how the potential would change if the wire had a finite length, highlighting that the potential approaches a specific value as distance increases. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining potential energy in electrostatics.
SLTH02
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The electrostatic force repelling a charged particle from a long, straight, uniformly charged rod is given by
the equation F = 100 x ^ (-1) where x is the distance from the rod.
Relevant Equations
F = -(dU)/(dx)
I understand that you need to integrate f(x), and the negative of that is U(x).

But the last part of the problem says "Clearly state any assumptions you make."

And the answer is just the antiderivative of that f(x) without any constant from integrationHow does that make sense
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good observation. You might insert the actual question in the homework statement, but I gather the exercise asks for 'the' potential energy function.

Such a function is in fact determined to within a constant (we don't observe potentials, only forces ...) . Usually we take the potential to be zero at infinity, but in this case that can not be done: a consequence of assuming the linear charge is itself infinitely long.
 
BvU said:
a consequence of assuming the linear charge is itself infinitely long.
So what would happen if the linear charge is infinitely long?
 
An infinitely long wire looks the same from any distance,

A better question is: what would change if the wire had finite length
(nice exercise: check that ##V\rightarrow {Q\over {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} } ## for ##d\rightarrow \infty## )
 
  • Like
Likes SLTH02
BvU said:
An infinitely long wire looks the same from any distance,

A better question is: what would change if the wire had finite length
(nice exercise: check that ##V\rightarrow {Q\over {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} } ## for ##d\rightarrow \infty## )
Got it. thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top