Determing field gradient of Stern-Gerlach magnet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the field gradient of a Stern-Gerlach magnet needed to achieve a 1-mm separation between spin-up and spin-down silver atoms. The setup involves a 50-cm-long magnet and considers the average kinetic energy of the emitted atoms, which is influenced by temperature. Participants discuss the relationship between the magnetic force acting on the atoms and their motion in both the z- and x-directions. Key equations related to force, velocity, and displacement are explored to derive the necessary expressions for the z-deflection of the atoms. The conversation highlights challenges in applying kinematic equations to relate the motion of the atoms after they exit the magnetic field.
jay ess
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the field gradient of a 50-cm-long Stern-Gerlach magnet (d1) that would produce a 1-mm separation at the detector between spin-up and spin-down silver atoms that are emitted from an oven at T=1500. Assume the detector is located 50 cm from the magnet (d2). Note: While the atoms in the oven have average kinetic energy 3kBT2, the more energetic atoms strike the hole in the oven more frequently. Thus the emitted atoms have average kinetic energy 2kBT2, where the kB is the Boltzmann constant. The magnetic dipole moment of the silver atom is due to the intrinsic spin of the single electron. The Bohr magneton, e[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]/2mec≈5.788×10-9eV/G



Homework Equations


Fz=μ⋅∂B/∂zμ∂Bz/∂z


The Attempt at a Solution


The setup: the magnetic field gradient is oriented in the z-direction while the initial velocity of the atoms is in the x-direction.
The separation between the silver atoms is 1-mm, therefore, the distance traveled in the z-direction by the silver atoms is 0.5 mm=5x10-2cm which I call dz.
∂Bz/∂z=∇B
Fz=maz=μ∂Bz/∂z=μ∇B
Average kinetic energy of the particles: 1/2mvx2=2kBTvx=√(4kBT/m)
vx=d1/t1→t1=d1/vx=d1√(m/4kBT)
I know that while the atoms are in the field gradient they will be experiencing a force that causes them to move in the z-direction (I'm just sticking with the positive z-direction for simplicity) and once they're out of the field gradient they will be traveling at a constant velocity in both the x- and z-directions. I also know that I need to somehow relate all of this to the kinematic equations but I'm kind of at a loss right now.
vz=azt1 (since there's no initial velocity in the z-direction and acceleration is constant).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Jay ess.

You've got a good start. Can you find an expression for the z- deflection of an atom while traveling through the magnet in terms of t1? As the atom leaves the magnet it will have a z-component of velocity as you indicated as well as the x-component. Can you use these two components of velocity to determine the direction that the atom is traveling as it leaves the magnet? Then see if you can find the additional z-deflection as it travels to the detector.
 
That's the bit that's giving me the most trouble, relating the kinematics equations in all of this mess. I know that since the atom started out at the origin and without any initial velocity in the z-direction that I can find the position of the particle as it is leaving the gradient (let's call it dz1) by dz1=1/2az*t12=1/2μ∇B/m(m/4kBT)=μ∇B/(8kBT). But, after that I'm still kind of lost because everything else I try just seems to fall apart.
 
jay ess said:
dz1=1/2az*t12=1/2μ∇B/m(m/4kBT)=μ∇B/(8kBT).
That look's good except for leaving out a factor of d12.
But, after that I'm still kind of lost because everything else I try just seems to fall apart.

OK. You just have to calculate the additional displacement in the z direction after the atom leaves the magnet. This will be determined by the z-component of velocity and the time to get from the magnet to the detector. Since no force acts on the atom as it travels to the detector, the z-component of velocity will be constant and will equal whatever the z-component of velocity was at the instant the atom emerged from the magnet.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top