MHB Determing when f(x) and g(x) are in theta of h(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lepros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theta
Lepros
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If f(x) is in theta of h(x) and g(x) is in theta of h(x), then is f(x)+g(x) in theta of h(x)?

My initial thoughts on this are yes since the addition of the two functions shouldn't impact the value of the largest degree in both functions, as they would if they were multiplied, but I'm wondering what sort of proof technique I could use to prove this in a more mathematically sound way.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are right about the answer. However, you can't talk about the largest degree because f(x) and g(x) are not necessarily polynomials. To prove the statement formally, start by writing what $f(x)\in\Theta(h(x))$ and $g(x)\in\Theta(h(x))$ means by definition.

I believe this answer is suitable for the Discrete Mathematics section of this forum because $\Theta$ is often used in measuring discrete resources consumed by algorithms.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top