Determining an Equation of Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the motion of two cars on a 3D roller coaster to maintain a constant distance between them. A second order differential equation is used to describe the acceleration of the cars, incorporating variables such as the number of hills, track radius, hill height, and the angle of revolution. The simulation currently results in changing distances between the cars as they navigate hills. Suggestions indicate that maintaining a constant distance may require synchronizing their positions on the hills and ensuring equal spacing between hills. The conversation emphasizes the need for further clarification and potential solutions to achieve the desired motion dynamics.
MASH4077
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Problem Outline: I'm trying to determine how to keep the distance between 2 cars on a (3D) roller coaster ride. Currently the front car moves away from the back car.

My current implementation uses a second order differential equation to model the acceleration of the cars at time t. The equation is as follows:

y'' = ((n^3 * H^2 * y' ^ 2 * sin(n * theta) - n*g*H) * cos(n * theta)) / (R^2 + n^2 * H^2 *cos^2(n * theta))

n = no. of hills,
R = radius of the track,
H = height of the hills (in metres)
theta = angle of revolution about the track

This ODE is numerically integrated using the Runge-Kutta method.

Information much appreciated. Any further information please do not hesitate to ask.

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MASH4077 said:
Problem Outline: I'm trying to determine how to keep the distance between 2 cars on a (3D) roller coaster ride. Currently the front car moves away from the back car.

My current implementation uses a second order differential equation to model the acceleration of the cars at time t. The equation is as follows:

y'' = ((n^3 * H^2 * y' ^ 2 * sin(n * theta) - n*g*H) * cos(n * theta)) / (R^2 + n^2 * H^2 *cos^2(n * theta))

n = no. of hills,
R = radius of the track,
H = height of the hills (in metres)
theta = angle of revolution about the track

This ODE is numerically integrated using the Runge-Kutta method.

Information much appreciated. Any further information please do not hesitate to ask.

thanks.
I'm having trouble picturing what you want. What do y' and y" represent? Why would you cube the number of hills? and then multiply that by the square of the height of (which?) hill? What is theta measured from and how can that stay constant? Is the track circular, but with hills? More details...
 
Hi Chi,

Sorry for my explanations. I'll try to make it clearer. Basically what that second ODE does is it models the acceleration (y'') of a roller coaster car (theoretically it can represent any object) on a circular track that has radius (R), (n) hills each of height (H). Note the simulation runs in 3D. The angle (theta) represents the angle (in radians) that the car has with the x-axis. The car moves around the track in a clockwise manner. The (y') component is an approximation of the velocity (at time t).

What I what to achieve is to maintain the distance between two cars at each time step. Since currently as the simulation progress the roller cars as they move down a hill they move a part and as the to the bottom they move closer. The same happens as the cars move up a hill and reach the top.

If you need any further information please do not hesitate to ask :).
 
MASH4077 said:
What I what to achieve is to maintain the distance between two cars at each time step. Since currently as the simulation progress the roller cars as they move down a hill they move a part and as the to the bottom they move closer. The same happens as the cars move up a hill and reach the top.

If you mean to say that you want to keep the distance between the cars constant, the only way is to have the cars always at the same point on a hill as the other. The hills would have to be equally spaced, and the separation of the cars must be some multiple of the separation between two adjacent hills.

If you need a function to describe their separation as a function of time, someone else would have quicker insight to that than I.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top