Determining certain mass of a Hydrate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Larrytsai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
To determine the mass of the anhydrous salt from a hydrate weighing 5.82g with 62.9% water content, first calculate the mass of water by multiplying 5.82g by 0.629, resulting in approximately 3.66g of water. The remaining mass, which is 5.82g minus 3.66g, gives the mass of the anhydrous salt. This results in a mass of about 2.16g for the anhydrous salt. The calculations clarify the relationship between the hydrate's total mass and its components. Understanding these proportions is essential for accurate chemical analysis.
Larrytsai
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
5.82g of a Hydrate is taken. If 62.9% of H2O is contained in the Hydrate what is the mass of the anhydrous salt?

so far i got 62.9% and 37.1% and i was thinking about getting H2O in grams but i don't know how
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Larrytsai said:
5.82g of a Hydrate is taken. If 62.9% of H2O is contained in the Hydrate what is the mass of the anhydrous salt?

so far i got 62.9% and 37.1% and i was thinking about getting H2O in grams but i don't know how

Well, if you multiply 0.371 by 5.82, I believe that would give you the mass of the anhydrous salt since 0.629 x 5.82 is the mass of the water contained in the hydrate.
 
Snazzy said:
Well, if you multiply 0.371 by 5.82, I believe that would give you the mass of the anhydrous salt since 0.629 x 5.82 is the mass of the water contained in the hydrate.

O right i got it now thnx alot
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top