Determining Charges of Polyatomic ions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tclack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Ions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the determination of charges for polyatomic ions, particularly focusing on oxyanions. Participants explore various methods, assumptions, and challenges in identifying these charges, as well as the implications of oxidation states and naming conventions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the existence of a fool-proof method for determining charges of polyatomic ions, sharing their initial approach based on atomic ion states.
  • Another participant states that there is no universal method for determining these charges, suggesting that memorization of commonly used polyatomic ions may be more practical.
  • A participant proposes a method based on oxidation states of the central atom and discusses the charges of various oxyanions, questioning whether all oxyanions of the same central atom share the same charge.
  • Concerns are raised about the naming conventions for oxyanions, with one participant presenting two potential origins for the -ate suffix and seeking further sources for clarification.
  • Another participant mentions the complexity introduced by transition metals and their varying oxidation states, which complicate predictive properties of oxyanions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the methods for determining charges of polyatomic ions, with no consensus reached on a universal approach or the validity of the proposed naming conventions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their methods, including the dependence on oxidation states and the variability introduced by transition metals. The discussion highlights the complexity of naming conventions and the potential for exceptions.

Tclack
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Does there exist a fool-proof way of doing it?

I've scoured the forums, and I've already found this question, but the answers are not satisfying.

Here for example is exactly my question:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=525291&highlight=polyatomic+ions

I've already memorized a bunch of -ate's (nick the camel... and I've made my own to cover more)

HERE'S WHAT I ORIGINALLY THOUGHT:
My assumption is that you look at each atom's ion state and add them up. This works for some, but not others. Nitrate for example (NO3-).
A Nitrogen ion is -3 (or +5)
And each Oxygen is -2 (or +6)
So I can see +5 and -6 makes: -1, Which works out!

It doesn't work for Nitrite however (NO2-)
+5 plus -4 leaves a +1

So, Why is what I originally thought wrong?
and how does one determine the charges of polyatomic ions? (specifically oxyanions... for now)
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
There is a good new, and a bad news.

Bad news is - there is no universal method.

Good news is: it doesn't matter (much).

As you have already found, final result depends on the oxidation state on the central atom, and we can determine it knowing the polyatomic charge - so using it the other way around won't work.

However, in reality there are just a few polyatomic ions that are commonly used, so it is easier to remember them, than to look for elaborate schemes. NO3-, NO2-, SO32-, SO42-, PO43-, CO32-, perhaps BO33-. All those containing chlorine or bromine will have a charge of -1. There are some tricky phosphoric acids, but they are rarely used and I always just remembered they exist and I have to check the details once I need them.
 
I FOUND SOMETHING!

It's on wikipedia and it's not sourced, but...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxyanion#Naming

Does this make any sense? Sulfate is SO4^2−
But, let's assume we don't know that charge, and someone told us to write sulfate. So, it's not in group 7, so the central atom of S will have a 6+ charge. With 4 oxygens at -2 giving a -8 ox. number, the total is -2!

Superficially, this makes sense (I haven't exhaustedly checked every one), but if it is true, am I correct in assuming that all* oxyanions of the same central atom have the same charge?

So far I've found:
nitrate and nitrite have a -1 charge
phosphate and phosphite have a -3
perchlorate, chlorate, chlorite, hypochlorite all have -1 charge
Sulfate, sulfite, hyposulfite have a -2 charge
Arsenate, arsenite have a -3 charge
perbromate, bromate, bromite, hypobromite all have a -1 charge
Perselenate, Selenate and selenite have -2
*I assume that transition metals do their own thing, because I've found
Permanganate (MnO4^1-) and Manganate(MnO4^2-) apparently, Permanganate is formed from the Mn7+ ion and Manganate from the Mn6+ ion. Stupid transition metals ruin predictive properties.*One thing I'm trying to resolve is the determination of the -ate suffix.
There's two possible origins:
1. The naming rule from wikipedia. (Halogens get per_ate, the others get _ate if oxy #'s = grp #'s)
2. What I've always heard, that the most common oxyanion gets the -ate suffix

It seems unlikely that these are both correct. I've read #2 in at least two textbooks and I've only found #1 on wikipedia. This makes #2 more likely. However, checking a bunch of them gives merit to #1. Does anyone know of another source? I'd like to cite it if possible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't blame just transition metals, throw in periodic acid with two different forms depending on pH: IO4- and IO65-
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
8K