Determining Coefficient Of Friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the coefficient of friction using a force plate while pulling objects at various angles. It is noted that as the angle of the applied force increases, the normal force decreases, which complicates the calculation of the coefficient of friction. The formula derived suggests that the coefficient does not remain constant when the angle changes, leading to confusion about the relationship between applied force, normal force, and frictional force. The participant concludes that the applied force must also change with the angle to maintain balance, indicating that the coefficient of friction is not a simple constant in this scenario. The complexity of friction dynamics is acknowledged, and further reading is suggested for clarity.
YeeHaa
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
Hi,

I'm doing research on the Coefficient Of Friction using a forceplate. I'm trying to determine the coefficient by pulling several objects over the plate, and using the frictional force and normal force to determine the coefficient of friction (measured by the force plate).

When I pull the object in a different angle in the vertical plane, does this effect the coefficient of friction? I know the coefficient is a constant, but how else would i go by determining it when the angle changes constantly?

[PLAIN]http://www.roymech.co.uk/images11/friction.gif

In other words, when Fapp changes angle (upwards), how do i determine the coefficient of friction?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming that the surface on which the object is moving is horizontal.

As the angle of the pull on the object with the horizontal is increased, the normal reaction of the surface will decrease. But the frictional force will also decrease so that the coefficient of friction will (hopefully!) remain constant.
 
Well I thought so too, and came up with this:

P = applied force
Fw = friction force
N = normal force

N = G - Px

and

Fw = Py

Py = P.cos(α)
Px = P.sin(α)

µ = Fw/N

So this means that:

µ = P.cos(α)/(G-P.sin(α))

Which has very weird results (doesn't remain constant for a given applied force and weight).

What am I missing here?
 
What I had in mind was exactly as in your last post.Even the calculation.

Note that the pulling force P is not any force you choose. P must be that force which JUST makes the object tend to slide.

I think that as angle of P with the horizontal changes, the value of P will also have to change.

Anyway, the topic of friction is not easy. You may read about it in THE FEYNMANN LECTURES vol 1.
 
I know for static friction, the friction force and normal force are the forces on the moment when the object JUST tends to slide. I made all my calculations based on this.

For kinetic friction i averaged the values of the normal force and friction force during the time the object is moving.

So the explanation i give would be correct, if i say the applied force must change too in order to keep balance?

I'll look up the book you referenced me to.

Thanks.
 
Yes I think that the applied force just to make the body slide changes with angle of applied force.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top