Determining concentration of a particular substance in a solid?

AI Thread Summary
Determining the acrylamide content in foods like French fries and potato chips involves a complex process that typically requires sophisticated techniques such as Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) or High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-MS). The procedure begins with extracting the acrylamide from a weighed portion of the food using a pure solvent, followed by separating it from other substances to ensure accurate measurement. This method necessitates the use of external standards for comparison and must detect acrylamide at very low concentrations, often in parts per million or billion.To enhance accuracy, additional techniques like adding an internal standard or employing the method of standards addition are used. These methods help account for matrix effects during extraction and ensure reliable quantification. While there are cheaper alternatives that utilize specific chemical reactions detectable by visual methods, these may not provide the required sensitivity and specificity for accurate acrylamide measurement. Overall, the process is neither inexpensive nor straightforward.
adic2110
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This question may sound a bit odd, but is there a relatively simple way(by simple, I mean inexpensive) to determine how much acrylamide is in a certain type of food(e.g. French fries, potato chips)?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
For the item you are asking about, a weighed portion of the food (called an aliquot) is subjected to an extraction by a pure solvent to remove quantitatively the analyte (the acrylamide). A method that can detect the small amounts of the analyte is used to get a signal, and that is compared to a standard of the analyte at a known concentration.

In practice, the method for acrylamide has to be able to separate it from other interfering substances also extracted from the aliquot of food. It usually also needs to see separately at a similar quantity an external standard so a comparison can be made. It also has to be able to see the analyte in parts per million or parts per billion- this is typically a GC-MS or HPLC-MS method...

There are additional methods used to verify the quantitative nature of the extraction and account for matrix effects. These are addition of an internal standard, and method of standards addition. An internal standard is added to the food and allowed to extract along with the analyte. It is assumed that they both behave in the same fashion to being extracted. The method standards addition, adds controlled amounts of the analyte to the food, so that matrix effects on the extraction can be studied over a range of concentrations- these are teased out by plotting the measurements vs the varied concentrations of standard and unknown.
 
In short it isn't cheap and isn't easy...

Cheap methods try to use a chemical reaction that is specific to the analyte and can be distinguished by vision (i.e. spectrophotometrically). Reactions that produce light and react enzymatically meet the issue of specific reaction and can be appropriately sensitive, but may be beyond cheap or easy.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top