Determining electron configuration with quantum numbers n l

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between quantum numbers (n, l) and the determination of orbitals in quantum dots. Specifically, the question arises about the implications of having (n, l) = (1, 2) and how this relates to the number of electrons that can occupy a quantum dot. There is confusion regarding the filling of orbitals, particularly the transition from the SSPSP notation to SPDSF, which raises questions about the representation of orbitals versus terms. Participants express a lack of clarity on the subject, noting that the symbols used seem more aligned with terms rather than orbitals, and there is an acknowledgment of the need for further explanation on how quantum numbers correspond to specific orbitals. The discussion also references a related thread on energy levels of quantum dots, indicating a broader context for the inquiry.
rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
This relates to a question I asked recently on Quantum Dots, but I'll rephrase it and hopefully any chemists out there can help.

If we have (n,l) = (1,2) where n and l are quantum numbers can we determine the orbitals? and hence the number of electrons in a quantum dot?

i.e.
lrq3kH2.jpg


And also I've always used the SSPSP... to fill orbitals, what's happened to the second S etc? why does he go SPDSF

Thanks in advance for any help, completely lost.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
No idea what is going on. Symbols look to me as if he was writing about terms, not orbitals. Not that it makes sense to me with terms.
 
Locking here.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
27K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K