1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Determining equilibrium position between two springs

  1. Mar 14, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    see attachment ***indicates correct answer

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I do not understand how this works, and I haven't been able to find any examples of this.

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 14, 2016 #2
    Equilibrium would imply that the net force on the mass is zero. The only 2 forces are the forces from either spring. So you must find the position at which the spring forces cancel out. Remember that force from a spring is F = -kx, where x is displacement from equilibrium position and is a vector quantity.
  4. Mar 14, 2016 #3
    As the above poster said, the net force on the mass is going to be zero because it's in equilibrium, meaning you can equate the two spring forces. That will give you one equation with two unknowns, meaning you're missing some piece of information. When it's not obvious, it's usually some constraint equation you're overlooking, and in this case it will be related to the total length of both springs. Because the forces are in equilibrium and you're given their lengths when not stretched, you can deduce a piece of information about their lengths in the equilibrium state that will allow you to solve the equation and find the block's position.
  5. Apr 18, 2017 #4
    distance equals spring length + spring displacement at equilibrium: d=1+x1
    distance equals total system length - length of second spring and its displacement: d=3-(1+x2)
    equate both expressions: 1+x1=3-1-x2 isolate x2: x2=1-x1

    forces are equal at equilibrium => k1x1=k2x2 isolate x2: x2=(k1x1)/k2

    equate both expressions of x2:
    (k1x1)/k2 = 1-x1 => x1=k2/(k1+k2)

    => d=1+x1= 1+k2/(k1+k2) = 1+ 300/400 = 1.75 m
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted