Chemistry Determining Intermolecular Forces - Ionic Crystals and Network Solids?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding intermolecular forces (IMFs) in ionic crystals and network solids. Participants express confusion about identifying the specific IMFs present in various compounds, particularly regarding ionic crystals and network solids. It is noted that all compounds possess London Dispersion Forces, and the user is comfortable identifying dipoles and hydrogen bonds. The example of KMnO4 is mentioned to illustrate the challenge in determining the forces at play. Ultimately, the user reports gaining clarity on the topic after class discussions.
kk727
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is the worksheet:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:9jyqtuswY1AJ:www.chemmybear.com/groves/apch13_imfans.doc+ap+chem+pasadena+imf%27s&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

Homework Equations


None, as far as I know


The Attempt at a Solution


This is probably way more simple than I'm assuming it to be...but I'm not sure how to tell what IMF's each compound has. My teacher said that everything at least has London Dispersion Forces, so I know how to figure that out. I have no problem finding dipoles, or determining if something is a hydrogen bond. How do you know if something is an ionic crystal or network solid? That's where I'm lost. Thanks!

Like, for example, KMnO4. How would I go about determining the forces present?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, we went over this in class, and I understand it much better now.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top