Determining Molecular Formula of Hydrocarbon from Reactions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the molecular formula of a hydrocarbon based on combustion data. Participants analyze the relationship between pressure, volume, and temperature using the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) to find moles of gas produced. They calculate the moles of carbon dioxide and water generated from the combustion, leading to the establishment of equations that relate the moles of hydrogen and carbon. The ratio of moles of water to carbon dioxide indicates a hydrogen to carbon ratio of 4 to 1. The calculations suggest that the hydrocarbon's molecular formula can be deduced from these relationships and ratios.
cobaltcalcium
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This problem was proposed to us by our Chemistry professor. Consider a sample of a hydrocarbon at 0.959atm and 298K. Upon combusting the entire sample in oxygen, you collect a mixture of gaseous carbon dioxide and water vapor at 1.51atm and 375K. This mixture has a density of 1.391 g/L and occupies a volume four times as large as that of the pure hydrocarbon. Determine the molecular formula of the hydrocarbon.


I really do not know how to go about the problem. I think there's a relationship between the information that I am not seeing properly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well here's a hint. In the formula for pressure. PV=nRT. n is the number of moles. Does that help you?
 
how can you re-write PV=nRT so that you can find molecular mass?

density equals what? how do you find moles?
 
I know the ideal gas law, how to find moles etc. Density = mass/volume. But I'm still getting confused with what to do with all the data.
 
Well the moles of the 2 are going to be the same. Think you can do it now?
 
This is what's on my scratch paper so far:

054 moles at 1.51atm/375k yields 1 liter
now molar wt for water is 18 g/m and CO2 is 44 g/m

say x is number of moles hydrogen needed
and y is number of moles carbon needed
from above we build a formula total moles equal to .054
so
x + y= .054
x=.054 -y
and we know that number moles times molar wt gives the weight and from above we know total weight is 1.391 g
so x *18g + y* 44g = 1.391g
or
18x + 44y = 1.39
x= (1.39 - 44y)/18
x= .077 - 2.44y
so combine
.077-2.44y = .054 - y
.077 - .054 = 2.44 y - y
.023 = 1.44 y
y = .016 mole
and
x=.054-.016
x= .038 mole
water to CO2 molar ratio is .038 /.016
or about 2 to 1
because water has 2 hydrogens and CO2 has only 1 carbon
the hydrogen to carbon ratio is 4 to 1
now find the size of the hydrocarbon buy finding the ratio of moles hydrocarbon to moles of CO2 /water mixture
ideal gas law ... pv=nrt or n=pv/rt
if the 1 subset is for before reaction
and the 2 subset is for after
r=(p1 v1)/(n1 t1) before
and
r= (p2 v2)/(n2 t2)
so
(p1 v1)/(n1 t1) = (p2 v2)/(n2 t2)
also some equalities
p2=(1.51/.959) p1= 1.57 p1
t2= 1.25 t1
v2 = 4 v1
so
( p1 v1 t2 )/(p2 v2 t1) = n1/n2
(p1 v1 1.25 t1)/(1.57 p1 4 v1 t1) =n1/n2
(1.25/ 4 * 1.57) =
n1/n2 = .2
5 n1 = n2
so you need 5 times more moles in the product then in the reactant.

Am I doing this right?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top