Determining unit vector of acceleration and velocity in circular motio

AI Thread Summary
In circular motion, the unit vector for velocity is derived by dividing the velocity vector by its magnitude, similar to other types of motion. The position vector in Cartesian coordinates is expressed as a function of time, incorporating sine and cosine functions to represent the circular path. An example provided illustrates the calculation of the unit vector for position, which is dependent on time. The discussion highlights the importance of confirming one's understanding through clear communication. Overall, the complexities of determining unit vectors in circular motion are acknowledged, emphasizing the need for clarity in discussions.
negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0
As a particle orbits around a circle, the unit vector of the velocity and acceleration component is constantly changing, so, how do I determine the unit vector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The unit vector for, say, velocity, is the velocity vector divided by the vector-magnitude - same as for any motion.
What is the problem? Can you provide an example where a difficulty arises?

$$\vec v = v\hat v: \hat v = \frac{\vec v}{v}$$

eg. Circular motion about origin at constant speed v and radius R, in Cartesian coordinates:

##\vec r (t) = \hat\imath R\sin\omega t + \hat\jmath R\cos\omega t : v=R\omega##

The unit vector for position would be:

##\hat r = \hat\imath \sin\omega t + \hat\jmath \cos\omega t ##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
The unit vector for, say, velocity, is the velocity vector divided by the vector-magnitude - same as for any motion.
What is the problem? Can you provide an example where a difficulty arises?

$$\vec v = v\hat v: \hat v = \frac{\vec v}{v}$$

eg. Circular motion about origin at constant speed v and radius R, in Cartesian coordinates:

##\vec r (t) = \hat\imath R\sin\omega t + \hat\jmath R\cos\omega t : v=R\omega##

The unit vector for position would be:

##\hat r = \hat\imath \sin\omega t + \hat\jmath \cos\omega t ##

Just as I suspected. I wanted to confirm my understanding.
Thanks for the input.
 
Gah - I think I got suckered: well done!
In future - if you want to confirm your understanding, just state your understanding and ask.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top