Developing mathematical maturity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bonfire09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of developing mathematical maturity, particularly in the context of problem-solving in linear algebra. A common issue highlighted is the tendency to glance at solutions after struggling with a problem for a limited time, specifically in proof-based exercises. Participants express differing views on whether it is acceptable to consult solutions after a period of effort. Key reasons for looking at solutions include verifying one's own answers and seeking hints when stuck. The conversation emphasizes the importance of perseverance in problem-solving and the value of experience gained over time in both academic and practical applications, such as laboratory work or professional settings. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that individuals should strive to work through problems independently before resorting to answer keys, as this fosters deeper understanding and skill development.
bonfire09
Messages
247
Reaction score
0
One of the problems that I come across is my bad habit of glancing at the solutions. I usually look at them after I struggle on a problem for 20 minutes. Almost always its a proof problem like in linear algebra such as "Prove that there is one and only one way to write A as the sum of a symmetric matrix and a skew-symmetric matrix." Then I go back and finish the problem after looking the solution up. Some people say to keep struggling it out while others say its fine to look at the solution after you struggled for sometime. Anyone have any input on that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Only two reasons for looking at the solutions:

  • Check your result or work after you answer an exercise,
  • Find help or hints if you are stuck after spending a long time struggling with an item.

You judge when to look at the answer key. Do the work as well as you can before checking the key.

Thread topic title is about "mathematical maturity". This requires experience of study over several months, maybe even years, and also requires using some mathematical skills in your science or engineering laboratory sections, or even in employment situations. Not always linear systems, but I had sometimes needed to develop systems of two or three equations and to find sometimes values for three variables; the systems, although only consisting of maybe three uncomplicated equations, had linear and ratio terms involved. There was no answer key in the back of a book!
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top