Diagonalizability of a matrix containing smaller diagonalizable matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter oferon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Matrix
oferon
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Please don't mind my math english, I'm really not used to it yet..

Given R\in M_n(F) and two matrices A\in M_{n1}(F) and D\in M_{n2}(F) where n1+n2=n
R = \begin{pmatrix} A & B \\ 0 & D \end{pmatrix}
Given A,D both diagonalizable (over F), and don't share any identical eigenvalues - Prove that R is diagonalizable.

Ok, So what i did was building eigenvectors for R, based on the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A and D.
for example, suppose λ_1 is eigenvalue of A with eigenvector V = \begin{pmatrix} V1 \\ V2 \\. \\. \\. \end{pmatrix}, then taking U = \begin{pmatrix} V1 \\ V2 \\. \\. \\0 \\0\\0\end{pmatrix} would give R*U = λ_1*U thus λ1,U are eigenvalue and vector of R

I managed to do the same using D. So now I have a set of eigenvalues and vectors of R.
My question is - How can I tell that R has no other eigenvalues other than those of A and D, and finish my proof... Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you've shown that ##R## has ##n## linearly independent eigenvectors, since they come from different two matrices with no overlapping eigenvalues, and also where an eigenvalue does repeat within either ##A## or ##D##, the geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue is equal to its algebraic multiplicity (because ##A## and ##D## are both diagonalisable). Therefore, we can already write ##R## in the form ##PD P^{-1}## in the standard way; that is, ##R## is diagonalisable.

On the other hand, suppose there exists another eigenvalue of ##R## not covered by the eigenvalues of ##A## and ##D##. Then there must correspond an eigenvector that is linearly independent of all of the other eigenvectors of ##R##. But this means the eigenvectors of ##R## spans ##n+1## dimensions, which is not possible. So you cannot have another eigenvalue.
 
Thanks for your reply.
I still don't get it - I never said I found n eigenvectors. I said I found vectors for all eigen values of A and D.
How can you tell A gives total of n1 and D gives total of n2 vectors?
 
If an ##n\times n## matrix is diagonalisable, then it must have ##n## linearly independent eigenvectors. If you have a repeated eigenvalue with multiplicity ##k##, then the dimension of the corresponding eigenspace must also be ##k##. Is it possible you haven't found all the eigenvectors corresponding to each eigenvalue?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top