A Diagonalizing Hermitian matrices with adjoint representation

Luck0
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
Suppose I have a hermitian ##N \times N## matrix ##M##. Let ##U \in SU(N)## be the matrix that diagonalizes ##M##: ##M = U\Lambda U^\dagger##, where ##\Lambda## is the matrix of eigenvalues of ##M##. This transformation can be considered as the adjoint action ##Ad## of ##SU(N)## over its algebra ##\mathfrak{su}(N)##, so if I consider the generators ##\{t_a\}## of ##\mathfrak{su}(N)##, I can write expansions: ##Ad(U)t_a = Ut_aU^\dagger = \sum_b\Omega_{ab}(U)t_b##, ##M = \sum_a m_at_a##, ##\Lambda = \sum_a \lambda_a t_a##, where ##\Omega_{ab} \in O(N^2-1)##, the orthogonal group, and the diagonalization can be written as ##M = \sum_{a,b}\lambda_b\Omega_{ab}t_a##.

Note that since ##\Lambda## is diagonal, the generators in the expansion ##\Lambda = \lambda_a t_a## must also be diagonal, i.e., they must span the Cartan subalgebra of ##\mathfrak{su}(N)##, meaning that some of the coefficients ##\lambda_a## must be zero. This means that some of the columns of each matrix ##\Omega## will not enter in the sum ##\sum_{a,b}\lambda_b\Omega_{ab}t_a##. My question is, if I look at ##M = \sum_{a,b}\lambda_b\Omega_{ab}t_a## as a change of coordinates, can I still consider ##\Omega## as an element of ##O(N^2-1)##? Clearly, if I write the elements of ##\Omega## that appear in the sum in matrix form, it will be a rectangular matrix, but I don't know if I can complete it with zeros until I get a square matrix, and if I can, I can't see what happens to orthogonality.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is difficult to follow you. I think it will be clearer in a coordinate free wording. Complementations with zeros (or ones) are usually a hidden embedding. So what is here to be embedded where? And why are some ##\lambda_a=0\,?##
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top