Did Gravity Exist Before the Big Bang?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sylickon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the existence and nature of gravity before the Big Bang, exploring theoretical implications and the role of gravity in the early universe. Participants examine concepts related to energy, mass, and the behavior of particles in extreme conditions, touching on both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that gravity existed before the formation of atoms, suggesting it was influenced by energy rather than matter, referencing the equivalence of mass and energy (E=mc²).
  • Others question the effects of gravity on energy, seeking to understand the implications of gravity's existence at that time.
  • One participant notes that gravity can affect light, as photons, despite being massless, can warp space and have their paths altered in gravitational fields, exemplified by gravitational lensing.
  • A claim is made that the entire Big Bang theory relies on the existence of gravity, with General Relativity expected to hold true until approximately 10^-40 seconds after the Big Bang, although quantum corrections may need to be considered.
  • Another participant questions whether gravity played a role in the agglomeration of sub-atomic particles before atoms existed, suggesting that gravitational forces were negligible compared to thermal motion during most of the universe's early history.
  • A later reply clarifies that before neutral atoms formed, there were still massive particles, including a quark-gluon plasma, and references a popular-level book for further reading on the topic.
  • One participant discusses the relationship between temperature and particle energy, explaining that during the early universe, high temperatures prevented the strong nuclear force from binding protons and neutrons, with gravity becoming significant only after the universe cooled sufficiently.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the existence and role of gravity before the Big Bang, with no consensus reached on the specifics of its effects or implications. Multiple competing perspectives remain, particularly regarding the significance of gravity in the early universe.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the gravitational forces at play during the early universe, noting the dependence on definitions and the unresolved nature of certain mathematical steps related to gravity and energy interactions.

Sylickon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Atoms were created 300,000 years after the big bang when the universe had finally cooled down enough. Did gravity exist before that point in time? If so what did it act like? thanks :)
 
Space news on Phys.org
yes gravity existed then by the energy not matter because energy and mass are equivilant (e=mc2) then the fabric of space can also be warped by energy and so exerts gravity.but i don't understand what u mean by what did it act like?
 
but what effect would gravity have on energy? what would be the difference between gravity existing and not existing at that time?
 
You can see the effect that gravity has on energy such as light. Photons are massless but they do warp space in the same way mass does, when photons themselves fly through a gravity well their path is changed. This can be seen in gravitational lensing.
 
The entire theory of the big bang is contingent on the fact that gravity exists -- i.e. General Relativity describes the motion of the universe as a whole. It is not at all important what is inside the universe -- whether it be atoms, people, electrons, or purple unicorns. We expect General Relativity to be correct up until very early after the big bang, something like 10^-40s to be conservative (roughly the Planck time).

Before this time, we expect some manifestation of what we call gravity to be present, but likely one needs to account for quantum corrections.
 
Did the first two sub-atomic particles agglomerate by the force of gravity before there were atoms?
 
PRDan4th said:
Did the first two sub-atomic particles agglomerate by the force of gravity before there were atoms?

No. With respect to the gravitational force between individual entities in the universe, it is negligibly small for most of the universe's history. Specifically, the random thermal motion was more than enough to make the force of gravity basically moot in determining particles' trajectories.
 
To be a little more concrete -- before the universe was cool enough to have neutral atoms, it had nuclei and electrons. At some time before that, it was so hot that rather than protons and neutrons, there was a quark-gluon plasma. So it's not as though there were no massive particles.

There is a wonderful popular-level book on this kind of thing called The First Three Minutes.

-Ben
 
as u increase the temp in a medium u increase the energy of the particles in that medium and thus there speed. and in the first fraction of a second after the big band the temp was about 10 billion degrees kelvin and thus the particles where highly energetic to the point that not even the strong nuclear force (the em force is about 10^40 times stronger than gravity and the strong nuclear force is stronger than em force) was able to bind protons and neutrons together . after the universe cooled down the strong nuclear force was able then to combine neutrons together with protons then after the universe cooled even more the em force was able to form atoms and at last the gravity was able to form stars and galaxies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K