Did I Calculate the Volume and Density Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bedizzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of a container filled with liquid mercury and determining the density of a second liquid. The user calculated the mass of mercury as 133.8 g, leading to a volume of approximately 9.877 mL. For the second liquid, they found a mass of 4.7 g, resulting in a density of about 4.8 g/mL. Responses confirm the calculations are correct, providing reassurance to the user. The user expresses gratitude and indicates they will return for further assistance in the future.
bedizzy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Question:

The mass of a container filled with liquid mercury is 244.0 g, and the mass of the empty container is 110.2 g

a. What is the volume of the container? (density of mercury = 13.546 g/ml)

b. The same container is filled with a second liquid, and the mass of the filled container is 114.9 g. What is the density of the second liquid?



My answers:

a)

244.0 g - 110.2 g = 133.8 g
133.8 g/(13.546 g/mL) = 9.877 mL


b)

114.9 g - 110.2 g = 4.7 g
4.7 g/9.877 mL = 4.8x10 g/mL



Does that look right? if not where did I go wrong?

I appreciate the help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi bedizzy! Welcome to PF! :smile:
bedizzy said:
Question:

The mass of a container filled with liquid mercury is 244.0 g, and the mass of the empty container is 110.2 g

a. What is the volume of the container? (density of mercury = 13.546 g/ml)

b. The same container is filled with a second liquid, and the mass of the filled container is 114.9 g. What is the density of the second liquid?


My answers:

a) 244.0 g - 110.2 g = 133.8 g
133.8 g/(13.546 g/mL) = 9.877 mL

b)114.9 g - 110.2 g = 4.7 g
4.7 g/9.877 mL = 4.8x10 g/mL

Does that look right? if not where did I go wrong?

Looks fine to me! :biggrin:
 
thanks tim... just wanted to check that one...


you'll probably be seeing more of me in the coming semesters :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top