Stargazing Did I Capture Pluto in My Backyard?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andy Resnick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pluto
AI Thread Summary
Images taken on July 25 and 27 captured what may be Pluto, using a camera aimed based on Google Sky, near the bright star π Sgr. The photographer utilized 0.8-second exposure stacks at ISO 2500, despite limitations from a house obstructing their equatorial mount. There is excitement about confirming the capture with additional images taken over the weekend. The discussion also touches on the challenges of photographing other celestial bodies like Mercury, with tips shared about optimal viewing conditions. Overall, the thread highlights the enthusiasm for astrophotography and the pursuit of capturing distant planets.
Andy Resnick
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
7,664
Reaction score
3,711
Two images, taken on 7/25 and 7/27, both at 11pm. Couldn't use my equitorial mount- a house was in the way- these are stacks of 0.8s exposures (400/2.8, ISO 2500) and heavily post-processed.

Pluto%207_25%20and%207_27_zpsaqkuvzxs.jpg


Pluto's a planet, I don't care what anyone else says. :)
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2, davenn, Drakkith and 5 others
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Andy Resnick said:
Pluto's a planet, I don't care what anyone else says. :)
upload_2017-7-28_14-58-54.png

Now wait a minute Bub ... I'm no planet.
 
Very cool, Andy!
By the way, how did you find it? Did you use a motorized/computerized telescope?
 
Well done Andy ... I have yet to see pluto ... the last on the list
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
DennisN said:
Very cool, Andy!
By the way, how did you find it? Did you use a motorized/computerized telescope?

I aimed my camera according to Google Sky- Pluto is near a bright star in Sagittarius (π Sgr). I took a bunch more images over the weekend, hopefully this will provide confirmation!
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
davenn said:
Well done Andy ... I have yet to see pluto ... the last on the list
Thanks- I'm still missing Mercury, it's usually too low on the horizon.
 
Andy Resnick said:
Thanks- I'm still missing Mercury, it's usually too low on the horizon.

You just got to get your scope higher. Way, way higher... :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and Andy Resnick
Andy Resnick said:
Thanks- I'm still missing Mercury, it's usually too low on the horizon.

haven't photo'ed that I can recall
but have seen many times over the years
 
Andy Resnick said:
Thanks- I'm still missing Mercury, it's usually too low on the horizon.
Try it when it's hot outside, that's when Mercury rises, I've been told.
 
  • Like
Likes Andy Resnick and Drakkith
  • #10
Andy Resnick said:
Thanks- I'm still missing Mercury, it's usually too low on the horizon.

It's near its maximum elongation now - 27 degrees. (Max was yesterday) It looks like it just set where you are, but there's always tomorrow. It's near Regulus.
 
  • Like
Likes Andy Resnick
  • #11
Clear nights for the past week- unheard of! Here's what I was able to capture:

Presentation1_zpsrgo1onnm.jpg


Off for vacation next week; I'm renting a nikon 105/1.4 specifically to try it out for astrophotography (I need to replace my now incompatible 85/1.4 lens at some point).
 
  • Like
Likes mfb, DennisN, davenn and 1 other person
Back
Top