Did I explain this right? Basic absolute value functions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around graphing the absolute value function y=|x+6| using two linear equations. The method described involves breaking down the absolute value into two cases: y=x+6 for x ≥ -6 and y=-x-6 for x < -6, with the intersection point at (-6,0). While the approach is valid, it is considered overly complex compared to the simpler method presented in the textbook, which focuses on finding the vertex directly. The graph of y=|x+6| is essentially a shift of the graph of y=|x| six units to the left. The user plans to review the textbook method for clarity.
SMA_01
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was helping my sister with her high school geometry homework, and she had to graph the absolute value function y=lx+6l using two linear equations. The way i did it was different than the way her book showed. Basically, I told her that when removing the absolute value you can get to distinct equations:

y=x+6 and -y=x+6 which becomes y=-x-6

I then told her that you can find the intersection point by setting the equations equal to each other, and solve for x. After getting the x-coordinate, you plug it back into the original equation to find the y coordinate. This will then give you the (x,y) coordinate point at which these two lines will intersect.

So at (-6,0) these lines will intersect.

I then told her to graph the two lines, making sure they intersect at this point.

To find the region on the graph that represents the absolute value function, I explained to her that y≥0. So the region on the graph that satisfied that condition represented the absolute value function.

Now, her teacher said something along the line that my method was wrong? Can someone please clarify what I did wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SMA_01 said:

Homework Statement



I was helping my sister with her high school geometry homework, and she had to graph the absolute value function y=lx+6l using two linear equations. The way i did it was different than the way her book showed. Basically, I told her that when removing the absolute value you can get to distinct equations:

y=x+6 and -y=x+6 which becomes y=-x-6

I then told her that you can find the intersection point by setting the equations equal to each other, and solve for x. After getting the x-coordinate, you plug it back into the original equation to find the y coordinate. This will then give you the (x,y) coordinate point at which these two lines will intersect.

So at (-6,0) these lines will intersect.

I then told her to graph the two lines, making sure they intersect at this point.

To find the region on the graph that represents the absolute value function, I explained to her that y≥0. So the region on the graph that satisfied that condition represented the absolute value function.

Now, her teacher said something along the line that my method was wrong? Can someone please clarify what I did wrong? Thanks.

Your explanation was much, much longer then needed, and is also unneccessarily complicated. An absolute value vanishes only when the thing inside the | | signs is zero, so y = 0 only at x = -6. When the thing inside | | is positive, the absolute value equals the thing itself; otherwise, the absolute value is the negative of the thing (and will, therefore, be positive---since it would be the negative of a negative thing). So, for x > -6 we have y = x+6 but for x < -6 we have y = -(x+6) = -6 - x. The graph will be like that of y = |x|, but just shifted 6 units to the left.

RGV
 
@Ray: Thanks, I tried to explain it to her through methods she already knows, that way she won't forget it as easily. I kind of lost you at the end, though, can you please clarify that?

Also, was my method considered "wrong"?
 
SMA_01 said:
@Ray: Thanks, I tried to explain it to her through methods she already knows, that way she won't forget it as easily. I kind of lost you at the end, though, can you please clarify that?

Also, was my method considered "wrong"?

I can't see anything wrong with your method, but as I said, it is much more complicated than it needs to be. If the teacher says it is wrong, that just shows that either the teacher does not know the subject matter, or else your sister explained it to the teacher incorrectly or presented it wrongly, or something.

As to your being lost at the end of my message: would that be my statement that the graph of y = |x+6| is just the graph of y = |x|, but shifted 6 units to the left? What is confusing about that? The graph of y = |x| looks like the letter 'V', with vertex at x = 0 and y = 0. The graph of y = |x + 6| looks like the letter 'V'; but with vertex at x = -6 and y = 0. It really is the first graph moved 6 units to the left.

By the way: you said your method was different from that in the book. What WAS the method in the book?

RGV
 
I understood that it shifts, and I reread it and understood the end thanks! Her book showed a method using a formula to compute the vertex, and there was another method that honestly lacked detail so I couldn't get the point. I will try to look it over again, and see how they do it. Thanks again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K