Did I Make Mistakes in Calculating the Potential of a Charged Sphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential of a charged sphere with a non-uniform charge density. The user initially struggles with the calculations, particularly in finding the value of the constant β and the electric field using Gauss's law. Clarifications are provided regarding the correct formula for potential, which is V = Q/(3πε₀R), emphasizing the need to use ε₀ instead of ξ. The conversation highlights the importance of clear notation and the correct application of formulas in solving physics problems. Ultimately, the user is reassured that their calculations were mostly accurate, and they have arrived at the correct potential expression.
Neolight

Homework Statement


A sphere of radius R has a volume charge density proportional to distance from center. Total charge contained in the sphere is Q. If electric potential at infinity is taken to be zero , potential at it's center is

Homework Equations


Here given are
ρ= βr where β is a constant

The Attempt at a Solution


Since in this question the charger density is not uniform so I attempted the question by first finding out the electric field on the inside and outside region by using Gauss law than.

IMG_20171101_002557.jpg


IMG_20171101_003427.jpg
Please give me some hints on what I have done wrong because the answer is
V= Q/3Πξ.R
And I also think that somehow we have to find the value of β

And one final personal question
Is this question a difficult level question because I have spent like 2 hours in a day for 4 days and haven't been able to answer due to mistakes here and there and lately because of this I have started losing confidence in myself because I can't even solve this question.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20171101_003427.jpg
    IMG_20171101_003427.jpg
    44.8 KB · Views: 451
  • IMG_20171101_002557.jpg
    IMG_20171101_002557.jpg
    44 KB · Views: 352
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't want to read your sideways picture, but ## Q=\int\limits_{0}^{R} \beta r \, 4 \pi r^2 dr ##. That will allow you to find ## \beta ##. You then need to find ## E(r) ##, (by Gauss' law), as a function of ## r ## both inside and outside the sphere. That will allow you to compute ## V(r)=-\int\limits_{+\infty}^{r} E(r') \, dr' ##. ## \\ ## Maybe I'm a little fussy, but I think it is asking a lot to have someone need to turn their computer sideways to try and read a sideways picture.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
IMG_20171101_002557_01.jpg
IMG_20171101_003427_01.jpg


I'm really sorry about that tilted photos.
Here are my calculations
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20171101_002557_01.jpg
    IMG_20171101_002557_01.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 767
  • IMG_20171101_003427_01.jpg
    IMG_20171101_003427_01.jpg
    26.9 KB · Views: 771
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
It looks quite accurate. The equation ## \beta \pi R^4=Q ## applies, so that ## \beta=Q/( \pi R^4) ##. You basically computed this, but didn't include it. You can substitute this for ## \beta ## in your final answer. From what I can tell it looks right=I didn't see any mistakes.
 
Neolight said:
View attachment 214150 View attachment 214151

I'm really sorry about that tilted photos.
Here are my calculations

You say your answer of V= Q/3Πξ.R is wrong. I cannot figure out if you mean ##\frac{Q}{2 \pi \xi R}## or ##\frac{Q}{3 \pi \xi} R## or something else. Parentheses would help.

Anyway, why do you think you answer is wrong? What is the apparent correct answer?

(I, for one, will not look at posted images; I look at typed work only, except for diagrams.)
 
Ray Vickson said:
You say your answer of V= Q/3Πξ.R is wrong. I cannot figure out if you mean ##\frac{Q}{2 \pi \xi R}## or ##\frac{Q}{3 \pi \xi} R## or something else. Parentheses would help.

Anyway, why do you think you answer is wrong? What is the apparent correct answer?

(I, for one, will not look at posted images; I look at typed work only, except for diagrams.)
Looks like the OP got the right answer, which is ## V=\frac{Q}{3 \pi \epsilon_o R} ##. And the OP should use an ## \epsilon_o ## (epsilon), rather than a ## \xi_o ## (xi).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top