Did I Make the Right Decision During My Statistics Test?

[HungryChemist]

Okay, I am sorry if my title is little too aggressive but that's just how I feel about what happened during my statistics test. The test was long and hard. In the middle of the test, professor said if you're behind time, go little faster and don't worry too much about computing numbers. Obviously, it is better to go over all the problems(there were three) than finishing one completely. When I was done solving one problem, 30 minutes already past and now just 20 more minutes to go. So I said to myself, okay, now I will spend 10 minutes each to rest of the problems. To do that, I will have to compensate detail calculations and checking, but just keep write down to the point where I can get enough partial credits. So I carried out exactly I planned it. No problem. And then the time was up, instead of start collecting the paper, professor said she will give us 10 more minutes if that's what everybody want to do and unless there's people who have to leave. So there was a brief moment of students looking at each other to see if anybody reject her offer.

I rejected it. I politely told her that I have to leave.

I thought I did the right thing. The test was promised to be given for 50 minutes only. I planned the test for 50 minutes. If I knew I that I had 10 more minutes, I could have fixed my mistakes all along the test. But obviously, when we were all leaving out of class, I could see couple (or many) students were upset and looked at me like I killed their dog. But I am sure some of us had to leave the class anyway for the next class.

The class has no absolute grading system. Everything will be curved. So either way it didn't really matter. Then why am I so pissed?

I am pissed because there were students who were pissed at me. Frankly, I didn't think that people would get mad at me. I must have thought that they must share my logic when I decided to rejected extra 10 minutes. So now I am not really sure if what I did was selfish act. I don't want to be a selfish gunner so I am really pissed for what I did. As you can see, I am confused. I feel like I became a scapegoat. Professor should never have offered such extra time. She should have known better.

Blame me or support me, I just want to hear what you have done in such case.

 

[cristo]

Well, from the way you say that if you had accepted the offer of an extra ten minutes, then you would have been able to correct some of the errors in your paper, then I would probably have said nothing and taken the extra time; but that's just my personal answer!

Besides, this can't be a very important test as the teacher wouldn't be allowed to just add extra time at the end if she wanted to. I wouldn't worry about your classmates being pissed with you; someone else will do something tomorrow for them to get annoyed with and they'll forget about why they were pissed with you!

 

[light_bulb]

i've seen someone get mad because one guy was answering all the questions, whatever you do don't come across as too smart or you'll get the wrath of everyone else in the class. i can picture eveyone elses face get red as one guy gets done before everyone else

in bizzaro land (school) if you excel to much you'll have to pay for it socialy.

if your good at anything hide it.

 

[mr_coffee]

Well, if I was taking an exam, and the professor said, i'll give you an extra 10 mins (my eyes would light up, I could finally double check or finish that problem I wasn't 100% sure on) and then hearing a follow student reject the extra time, trying to screw me out of my grade I would get pissed.

Because it doesn't matter if its logical or not, its cheating the other students of extra time to fix their little mistakes they made because they might not have planned it out like you did.

If you didn't want the extra 10 mins you could have just gave the professor the exam and left without saying anything.

Heres my theory:
The reason your upset is, you planned better than the other students, but given that extra 10 mins, you wouldn't be able to modify your version of your answers to give you those extra points, but instead you probably would have messed yourself up worse if you did try to do the actual calculations or it would just be too messy/crammed with words and numbers to make any sense or you thought well I followed what the professor said so now here is my reward.

But the students who did do the actual calculations, that extra 10 mins probably gave them the advantage over you.

But without the 10 mins you had the advantage over them.

But that's just my theory!As the above poster said, you can't act like a know it all either, or you will be disliked. It happens in all classes/schools.

I don't like this kid in one of my comp sci classes who asks every single question in the world, trying to outsmart the professor even though his questions have no relevance or his solutions he thinks are right don't make any sense.

 

[light_bulb]

I don't like this kid in one of my comp sci classes who asks every single question in the world, trying to outsmart the professor even though his questions have no relevance or his solutions he thinks are right don't make any sense.

wonder what the professor thinks?

 

[chroot]

I think you need to lighten up a little bit; it's just a test.

- Warren

 

[cristo]

if your good at anything hide it.

That's probably the single worst piece of advice I've ever heard. What's the point in putting on an act and pretending you're someone else? Even if then more people like you, they aren't going to like you are they? They're going to like some fake version of you that pretends they're someone else because they're too scared of what people think .

As the above poster said, you can't act like a know it all either, or you will be disliked.

I agree with this-- but there's a big difference between being good at something and being a know it all.

 

[out of whack]

HungryChemist, I would have done what you did. Everyone knew the test duration from the start and planned their work accordingly so nobody has any justifiable complaint. Changing the allocated time at the last minute rewards sloppy planners at the expense of good planners. Ignore critics, don't make their problems your own.

 

[dontdisturbmycircles]

It probably won't matter in a week. You did what you thought was right so just let it be.

 

[Evo]

It doesn't matter what you planned for, there was a chance for an extra ten minutes for everyone. I'm assuming that everyone had only planned the test to last 50 minutes, that doesn't mean that they wouldn't welcome the extra time. If you could have spared the extra ten minutes and you were the only one to reject it, I have to agree that was selfish. It sounds like you were thrown by the offer of extra time that you hadn't expected. Don't be so rigid.

What I don't understand is why the teacher had an "all or none" policy. Why should everyone suffer for one person?

 

[Cyrus]

No problem. And then the time was up, instead of start collecting the paper, professor said she will give us 10 more minutes if that's what everybody want to do and unless there's people who have to leave. So there was a brief moment of students looking at each other to see if anybody reject her offer.

I rejected it. I politely told her that I have to leave.

ERRRRRNNNNNNN WRONG.. You should have used those 10 minutes.

If I knew I that I had 10 more minutes, I could have fixed my mistakes all along the test.

No, you knew you had those 10 minutes when she told you, and you decided to give them away. Now you can only blame yourself.

If I finish an exam 10 mins early and we get 10 mins, Ill stay an extra 20 mins just to look over stuff because I can.


Wow, if someone screwd me over for an extra 10 mins on the exam, Id stand next to the person and talk to my friend out loud and say something like "what an F'in idiot that guy is", so everyone can hear me. Thats just messed up man.

 

[morphism]

I don't understand what you had to lose if you accepted the extra 10 minutes.

 

[Moonbear]

I guess the prof was trying to be fair that if someone had another place to be and couldn't spend 10 extra minutes, they weren't penalized if everyone else was able to stay. And, if you really had to be somewhere (i.e., your next class) then the offer of an extra 10 min really wasn't helpful or fair to you, nor was it fair to put you in that position. The professor should have spent the time writing a test of appropriate length for the time allotted rather than expecting students to stay longer...not everyone can stay.

 

[dontdisturbmycircles]

The advantage of being well prepared for the test, I am not saying it made it right, but that is probably why he did it.

 

[Cyrus]

Unless he had an exam in the next class, he should have been 10 mins late to it.

 

[Evo]

The advantage of being well prepared for the test, I am not saying it made it right, but that is probably why he did it.

Who's to say the others weren't well prepared? For all his "preparedness", he wasn't anywhere near through. Other's might have been much closer to being finished than he was and the extra ten minutes could have really helped.

 

[Moonbear]

Unless he had an exam in the next class, he should have been 10 mins late to it.

And if the material covered in that 10 min appeared on the exam for that class? That's unreasonable to expect students to have to miss 10 min of their next class because of poor planning on the prof's part. He should just grade on a scale at this point knowing nobody had time to complete it.

 

[Cyrus]

I disagree 100%. I am late to class all the time and I don't fail exams. You're just not missing anything in the first 10 mins of class that you can't make up very very easily reading the book.

He was given a gift. Unless he had another exam, there's really no excuse. Thats why there is a book and a syllabus.

I've missed a week of class this semester for one of my classes and I am not behind. I was too tired to go, so I stayed home and slept . He can miss 10 minutes.

 

[dontdisturbmycircles]

Yes, if it is graded on a scale then I believe that it is not that bad, If it is not, then it would not be fair, but is the prof's fault, not the student.

 

[Cyrus]

What do you mean its not the professors fault? The fact that they didnt get extra time is his fault, not the professors.

Anyway, I'd be fuming if someone in the class gave away my extra time like that.



Oh well, now its over...but I wouldn't ask anyone in your class for help on anything anymore. You just shot yourself in the foot point blank with a cannon.

 

[out of whack]

Nobody was cheated out of anything. Results are graded on a curve. The test happened exactly as everyone knew it would. There was nothing to gain by changing the parameters at the last minute. What will be changed next time? Way to keep a class off balance. The prof screwed up by dangling this under the class' nose.

 

[Cyrus]

There was nothing to gain by changing the parameters at the last minute.

Yes there was, a gain of 10 minutes to do more work. No one said they were sitting there clueless. He clearly said he could have done it if he had those 10 mins.

He had everything to gain and nothing to lose.

 

[out of whack]

Yes there was, a gain of 10 minutes to do more work. No one said they were sitting there clueless. He clearly said he could have done it if he had those 10 mins.

You do understand how tests measure the relative knowledge of various students against each other, right?

 

[Cyrus]

You know that I don't care how I measure realtive to others right? I just care that I show that I know the material. The 10 mins shows that, because I would have had the time to do so.

I don't care if everyone else gets an A or a C. I care about *my* grade.

 

[out of whack]

You know that I don't care how I measure realtive to others right?

That's the purpose of a test graded on a curve.

 

[Moonbear]

Yes there was, a gain of 10 minutes to do more work. No one said they were sitting there clueless. He clearly said he could have done it if he had those 10 mins.

He had everything to gain and nothing to lose.

And what if a few people in the class WERE able to get done without the 10 min extra? Is it fair to them to then give more people a chance to "catch up?"

 

[light_bulb]

That's probably the single worst piece of advice I've ever heard. What's the point in putting on an act and pretending you're someone else? Even if then more people like you, they aren't going to like you are they? They're going to like some fake version of you that pretends they're someone else because they're too scared of what people think .



I agree with this-- but there's a big difference between being good at something and being a know it all.

who said anything about pretending? knowing when not to talk, nod your head in agreement or just keep quiet is an asset. one that i need to work on theirs a difference between being scared of what people think and not giving a crap, but instead of dealing with bs just let it go.

 

[Cyrus]

And what if a few people in the class WERE able to get done without the 10 min extra? Is it fair to them to then give more people a chance to "catch up?"

But they were not able to do it. Its not a hypothetical, its what the OP said clearly.


Even if *I* was finished early, I wouldn't screw the class over like that. I'd sit there for 10 mins and check my work over again so that I can get 100 and they can get 85, or whatever else they might get.

 

[Moonbear]

What do you mean its not the professors fault? The fact that they didnt get extra time is his fault, not the professors.

No, it is the professor's fault for writing an exam that cannot be completed in the appropriate time. He should grade accordingly, and not pit one student against the entire class by making those who have other committments choose between being late for those committments or have the entire class pissed off at them, or be put at a disadvantage for letting the rest of the class go ahead working on the exam while they left. If they were told they'd have 50 min to complete the exam, then whatever is completed in 50 min is all they should be given time to do. Instead, you're suggesting he should be unfair to his next class by disrupting it and walking in late, and unfair to himself by missing part of his next class. Maybe you can miss parts of lecture and be okay, but not everyone can miss the beginning of a lecture and still know what's going on the entire rest of the class. Or, what if the next class had a pop quiz at the beginning? Or a professor who takes attendance?

If the rest of the class is going to be mad about this, then let them be. It's time for them to grow up and learn that sometimes when deadlines hit, there are no extensions, and you just suck it up and accept what you get for what you have done by then.

 

[Cyrus]

That's the purpose of a test graded on a curve.

No, a test is to show if you understand the material. Not who knows it better than the other person. If everyone knows it, everyone gets an A. THAT SIMPLE.