Did Jack Burn His Feet Jumping Over the Candlestick?

AI Thread Summary
Jack jumps over a candlestick at a velocity of 5 m/s and an angle of 30 degrees. To determine if he burns his feet on the 0.25 m high candle, calculations using projectile motion equations show that he reaches the candle in approximately 0.1 seconds. His horizontal displacement during this time is calculated to be 0.25 meters, matching the height of the candle. Since Jack's trajectory allows him to clear the candle without contact, he does not burn his feet. Thus, Jack successfully jumps over the candle without incident.
manjuj
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Jack jumps over a candlestick with a velocity of 5 m/s at an angle of 30 to the horizantal. Did Jack burn his feet on the .25 m high candle?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Specifically, you are looking for Jack's maximum height in the parabola he will make (where the vertical component of his velocity will be zero). You can either use the parabola equation if you already derived it, or the acceleration equation, where your acceleration is due to gravity (-9.8[m/s^2]) with an initial speed of the vertical component of the initial velocity vector.
 


To determine if Jack burned his feet on the .25 m high candle, we can use the equation for projectile motion: h = h0 + (v0sinθ)t - (1/2)gt^2. In this case, h0 = 0 (since Jack starts at ground level), v0 = 5 m/s, θ = 30 degrees, g = 9.8 m/s^2 (acceleration due to gravity), and t is the time it takes for Jack to reach the candle.

We can solve for t by setting h = 0.25 m (height of the candle) and solving for t. Plugging in the values, we get:

0.25 = 0 + (5sin30)t - (1/2)(9.8)t^2
0.25 = (2.5)t - (4.9)t^2
0 = (4.9)t^2 - (2.5)t + 0.25

Using the quadratic formula, we can solve for t and get two solutions: t = 0.1 s or t = 0.05 s. Since the time cannot be negative, we can disregard the negative solution and conclude that it took Jack approximately 0.1 seconds to reach the candle.

Now, we can plug this value of t into the equation for horizontal displacement: x = x0 + (v0cosθ)t. In this case, x0 = 0 (since Jack starts at ground level), v0 = 5 m/s, and θ = 30 degrees. Plugging in the values, we get:

x = 0 + (5cos30)(0.1)
x = 0 + (5)(√3/2)(0.1)
x = 0 + 2.5(0.1)
x = 0.25 m

This means that Jack's horizontal displacement (or how far he traveled horizontally) is 0.25 meters, which is equal to the height of the candle. Therefore, Jack did not burn his feet on the .25 m high candle as he jumped over it with just enough clearance.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top