Did someone construct one to the universe in modern times?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Speculatrix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of a geometry that accurately represents the current understanding of the universe, particularly in relation to curved space. The original poster questions whether a comprehensive geometric framework has been developed or if existing models are merely approximations. Participants acknowledge that multiple geometries exist, but the correct one remains uncertain. A link to a promising model is provided, suggesting ongoing exploration in this area. The conversation highlights the complexity of accurately modeling the universe's geometry.
Speculatrix
I have a question. I'm not even sure that it makes sense or is a worthy question, so please bear with me.

Is there a geometry written for the current (accepted) view of the universe? It seems there must be a geometry that deals with curved space and other such features, but I have never heard of one. For a while people were just sort-of writing geometries--just making up systems that worked whether they had been seen or not, right? It seems crazy that someone could (or would) write one that worked for our universe without knowing its details. Did someone construct one to the universe in modern times? Or have we just never needed a complete geometry? It seems we must be using some geometry, but I don't know what it is.

Thanks for any insight. (I realize my question was probably worded badly and therefore partially incoherent.)

-Speculatrix
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There are several, we don't jknow which is correct, but http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/universe_soccer_031008.html seems to show a lot of promise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top