Did Tesla and Newton Overlook Love for Genius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Illuminerdi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Newton Tesla
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the lives of historical geniuses such as Michelangelo, Newton, and Tesla, highlighting their struggles with social interactions, particularly with women. These figures are portrayed as deeply engrossed in their work, often to the detriment of personal relationships. Michelangelo viewed sex negatively, equating it with death and sin, while Newton's troubled childhood led him to distrust women. Tesla's obsessive-compulsive disorder made him uncomfortable with certain feminine adornments. The conversation humorously speculates on the implications of these geniuses not reproducing, suggesting that their focus on their work prevented them from engaging in relationships. There is also a commentary on the broader societal trend where intelligent individuals tend to have fewer children, raising questions about the future of intellectual legacy and the concept of "Idiocracy." The dialogue touches on the complexities of genius and parenthood, questioning the relationship between intelligence and reproduction.
Illuminerdi
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
-Or other extreme geniuses who never had time for women. Imagine if people like that just took a few minutes out of their lives to populate the earth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Like Michelangelo, they were deathly scared of women, never got the hang of talking to women, and thought women were alien life forms.

Michelangelo equated sex with death, sin, corruption. He also considered himself so ugly he didn't think any woman would want him. Newton probably never overcame his resentment of his mother for leaving him in foster care while she ran off to be with her new husband. He suspected most women were treacherous. Tesla had severe OCD and couldn't stand the sight of certain female ornaments like earrings and the buttons on their dresses. All were also obsessed with their work and never took a break long enough to get the hang of being social with women, which would have been a slow and arduous remedial endeavor in their cases.
 
Last edited:
zoobyshoe said:
Like Michelangelo, they were deathly scared of women, never got the hang of talking to women, and thought women were alien life forms.

Michelangelo equated sex with death, sin, corruption. He also considered himself so ugly he didn't think any woman would want him. Newton probably never overcame his resentment of his mother for leaving him in foster care while she ran off to be with her new husband. He suspected most women were treacherous. Tesla had severe OCD and couldn't stand the sight of certain female ornaments like earrings and the buttons on their dresses. All were also obsessed with their work and never took a break long enough to get the hang of being social with women, which would have been a slow and arduous remedial endeavor in their cases.

Talk about humorless responses.
 
Gnosis said:
Talk about humorless responses.

I actually found that quite amusing. True, but amusing nonetheless. Newton was a raving Jes... (oops! I've been warned to not use that phrase) ...Christian fanatic. He probably would have made a mess in his pants if he'd seen a woman's elbow.
There's also the possibility that one or more of them were gay. Just because that was never referred to in those days doesn't mean that it didn't exist.
 
Gnosis said:
Talk about humorless responses.
Well, I'll get right on it, then.
Illuminerdi said:
Imagine if people like that just took a few minutes out of their lives to populate the earth.
It's interesting you should raise this train of speculation because recently, when I was crawling on all fours through the streets of Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A, toward the mother of all strange deaths, I happened to consider that Edgar Allan Poe left no progeny, no child of his macabre loins, no spawn of his dark alcoholic meanderings in the gutters of that city, or any of the fine American cities he drank his way through, when, to my surprise, I encountered nothing less than the revenant of the great poe-et, himself, crawling in the other direction.

"What ho! Poe!" I hailed him.

"Hoobie Joobie, Zooby!" he replied.

"It rhymes," I said, "but it's not your best work."

"Shut up! Do you have any money?"

"No. I wanted to ask you why you never fornicated with about 3000 women in order to produce a mass of literary geniuses to help populate the earth."

"Why should I have?"

"Just askin'. Inquiring Illuminerdi want to know."

"Do they have any money?"

"Possibly. A few dollars."

"Tell them to paypal me. I'll answer as soon as it comes through. Gotta go."
 
Illuminerdi said:
-Or other extreme geniuses who never had time for women. Imagine if people like that just took a few minutes out of their lives to populate the earth.

They might not have had time to do all of the wonderful things they did in their respective fields if they were busy raising kids. Besides, the Earth is populated enough.

Just curious, why do you care whether or not long-dead strangers had kids?
 
Jack21222 said:
They might not have had time to do all of the wonderful things they did in their respective fields if they were busy raising kids. Besides, the Earth is populated enough.

Just curious, why do you care whether or not long-dead strangers had kids?

Eugenic fascination: In western societies, intelligent people are having less children on average and there are two very high profile examples of the most intelligent people having no children. Is Idiocracy true?
 
Illuminerdi said:
Eugenic fascination: In western societies, intelligent people are having less children on average and there are two very high profile examples of the most intelligent people having no children. Is Idiocracy true?
How do you explain geniuses born of average parents and average people born of geniuses?
 
Evo said:
How do you explain geniuses born of average parents and average people born of geniuses?

It's probabilistic. Despite it having a degree of reliability, a system as complex as a human being has some stochastic processes involved.
 
  • #10
Illuminerdi said:
Is Idiocracy true?

idiocracy.png


From http://xkcd.com/603/
 
Back
Top