Diff Eq: Is it me? Or Wolfram? I know, it's me.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diff eq
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a fifth-order linear homogeneous differential equation with constant coefficients, specifically the equation y(5) - 2y(4) + y(3) = 0. Participants are analyzing their characteristic equation and comparing their solutions to those provided by Wolfram Alpha.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the characteristic equation derived from the original differential equation and explore the implications of their solutions. There is confusion regarding the presence of additional terms in the Wolfram solution and how it relates to their own derived solutions. Some participants express uncertainty about their methods and seek clarification on the equivalence of the solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively questioning their assumptions and interpretations of the solutions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between their solutions and Wolfram's, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of their approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for misunderstanding in the application of differential operators and the implications of their general solutions. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in comparing different forms of solutions.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



y(5) - 2y(4) + y(3) = 0

This is 5th-order, linear, HG, with constant coefficients, and hence I used the characteristic equation:

m5 - 2m4 + m3 =

m3(m - 1)(m - 1) = 0

Hence, m = {1,1,0,0,0} and so the solution is given by:

y(x) = C1 + C2*x +C3*x2 + C4*exp(x) + c5*x*exp(x).

This is the Wolfram solution.

They seem to have an extra exponential term inside of the parentheses. Am I missing something?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm... looking at the characteristic EQ, it would seem that:

m3(m2 - 2m + 1) = 0 and hence:

(m2 - 2m + 1) = 0 and so

y'' - 2y' + y = 0

But when you look at my solution, differentiation will cause my C1 term to drop out of the derivatives altogether, and hence it will not be able to cancel.

I have messed up somehow, but cannot seem to rectify it. I have tunnel vision right now and cannot seem to convince myself that my method is not correct.
 
Doesn't the wolfram solution reduce to yours on setting their c_1-3c_2 equal to your C_4?
 
In Wolfram's answer, you can just write c1-3c2 as some other symbol and get your same answer. But I am not sure exactly how Wolfram solved it.
 
Saladsamurai said:
Hmmm... looking at the characteristic EQ, it would seem that:

m3(m2 - 2m + 1) = 0 and hence:

(m2 - 2m + 1) = 0 and so

y'' - 2y' + y = 0

But when you look at my solution, differentiation will cause my C1 term to drop out of the derivatives altogether, and hence it will not be able to cancel.

I have messed up somehow, but cannot seem to rectify it. I have tunnel vision right now and cannot seem to convince myself that my method is not correct.

I am still not seeing how that rectifies this. Maybe I need a coffee ...
 
Your solution would not solve y'' - 2y' + y = 0

it will solve d3/dx3 (y'' - 2y' + y) to give 0.
 
Your solution (I changed c5 to C5):

[tex]y(x) = C_1 + C_2x +C_3x^2 + C_4\exp(x) + C_5x\exp(x)[/tex]

Wolfram's solution:

[tex]y(x)=c_5x^2 + c_4x+e^x(c_2x+c_1-3c2)+c3[/tex]

Those solutions are the same. To see this, set

[tex]\aligned<br /> C_1 &= c_3 \\<br /> C_2 &= c_4 \\<br /> C_3 &= c_5 \\<br /> C_4 &= c_1 - 3c_2 \\<br /> C_5 &= c_2<br /> \endaligned[/tex]
 
cristo said:
Doesn't the wolfram solution reduce to yours on setting their c_1-3c_2 equal to your C_4?

rock.freak667 said:
In Wolfram's answer, you can just write c1-3c2 as some other symbol and get your same answer. But I am not sure exactly how Wolfram solved it.

D H said:
Your solution (I changed c5 to C5):

[tex]y(x) = C_1 + C_2x +C_3x^2 + C_4\exp(x) + C_5x\exp(x)[/tex]

Wolfram's solution:

[tex]y(x)=c_5x^2 + c_4x+e^x(c_2x+c_1-3c2)+c3[/tex]

Those solutions are the same. To see this, set

[tex]\aligned<br /> C_1 &= c_3 \\<br /> C_2 &= c_4 \\<br /> C_3 &= c_5 \\<br /> C_4 &= c_1 - 3c_2 \\<br /> C_5 &= c_2<br /> \endaligned[/tex]

Ok! Thanks guys :smile:

rock.freak667 said:
Your solution would not solve y'' - 2y' + y = 0

it will solve d3/dx3 (y'' - 2y' + y) to give 0.

Hmmm.

[tex]\frac{d^5y}{dx^5} - 2\frac{d^4y}{dx^4} + \frac{d^3y}{dx^3} = 0[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow \frac{d^3y}{dx^3}\left(\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} - 2\frac{dy}{dx} +1\right) = 0[/tex]

Ok. I see that it wil not solve y'' - 2y' + y = 0. But from the above, should it not solve

[tex]\left(\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} - 2\frac{dy}{dx} +1\right) = 0[/tex]

which does not look promising. I know that I am seriously abusing the differential operator, but it should work eh?
 
Saladsamurai said:
Ok! Thanks guys :smile:



Hmmm.

[tex]\frac{d^5y}{dx^5} - 2\frac{d^4y}{dx^4} + \frac{d^3y}{dx^3} = 0[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow \frac{d^3y}{dx^3}\left(\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} - 2\frac{dy}{dx} +1\right) = 0[/tex]

Ok. I see that it wil not solve y'' - 2y' + y = 0. But from the above, should it not solve

[tex]\left(\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} - 2\frac{dy}{dx} +1\right) = 0[/tex]

which does not look promising. I know that I am seriously abusing the differential operator, but it should work eh?


y'' - 2y' + y = 0

has a solution of y=(Ax+B)e-x, which will solve y'' - 2y' + y = 0

Your general solution which contains more terms, I do not think will solve y'' - 2y' + y = 0.
 
  • #10
rock.freak667 said:
y'' - 2y' + y = 0

has a solution of y=(Ax+B)e-x, which will solve y'' - 2y' + y = 0

Your general solution which contains more terms, I do not think will solve y'' - 2y' + y = 0.

Ah ha. I see. I was trying to plug in my general solution to

[tex] \frac{d^5y}{dx^5} - 2\frac{d^4y}{dx^4} + \frac{d^3y}{dx^3} = 0[/tex]

which will of course have more terms than the general solution to just

[tex] \left(\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} - 2\frac{dy}{dx} +1\right) = 0[/tex]

Thanks again! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K