Diff EQ: Mixing Problem What am I doing wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter space_yes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diff eq Mixing
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation related to a mixing problem involving salt in a tank. The user initially struggles with the integration steps and the correct formulation of the solution, leading to an incorrect calculation of the amount of salt after two hours. After some back-and-forth, it is clarified that the user misapplied the constants and logarithmic properties, which contributed to the confusion. Ultimately, the user resolves the issue by using Mathematica, confirming the correct answer of approximately 20.54 kg of salt after 120 minutes. The conversation highlights the importance of careful manipulation of equations and verification through computational tools.
space_yes
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Alright, I know this has been done in various incarnations but I haven't found an example exactly similar to mine..

A tank contains 60kg of salt and 1000L of water. Pure water enters the tank at the rate of 8L/min. The solution is thoroughly mixed and drains at a rate of 4L/min. Find the amount of salt in the tank after 2 hours.

Homework Equations



y(t) = amount of salt in the tank after t minutes
v(t) = volume of water in the tank after t minutes

v(t) = 1000 + 8t-4t = 1000 + 4t

dy/dt = rate in - rate out

dy/dt = 8L/min * 0kg/L - y kg/(1000 + 4t L) * 4L/min

dy/dt = - 4y/(1000+4t)

The Attempt at a Solution



Separating...

dy/4y = - dt/(1000 + 4t)

Integrating both sides...

(1/4)Ln(y) = -(1/4)Ln(250+t)+c

y^(1/4) = (e^c)/(250+4t)^(1/4)

Let k be the arbitrary constant = e^c

y^(1/4) = k/(250 + 4t)^(1/4)

y = k/(250+4t)

Using the initial conditions...

60 = k/(250 + 4*0)
k = 15000

y = 15000/(250 + 4t) <--- this is not right
y(120) = 20.5479 <--- this is not right

The correct answer = 40.5405405405...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
space_yes said:
(1/4)Ln(y) = -(1/4)Ln(250+t)+c

y^(1/4) = (e^c)/(250+4t)^(1/4)

I'm not sure how you got from the first equation to the second, but if you fix this step, you'd get the right answer.
 
I raised both sides to powers of e to remove the natural logs so I can get an expression for y...

...should I be doing something else there?
 
I figured it out... the step where I let k = e^c is the problem. Leaving e^c and continuing we would have:

y = e^(4c)/(250+4t)

Letting k = e^(4c)...

y = k/(250+4t)

Solving for k = 15000...

Now solving for c to find the numerator in the expression for y...

15000 = e^(4c)
c = ln(15000)/4

Putting c back into e^(4c)/(250+4t) yields the correct expression:

y(t) = (e^(ln(15000))/(250+4t)

y(120) = 40.5405...
 
No, y(t) = (e^(ln(15000))/(250+4t) simplifies to 15000/(250+4t), because e^x and ln x are like addition and subtraction; if you take the log of a number and then raise e to the power of the result, you'll get the original number back. If you evaluate (e^(ln(15000))/(250+4t) correctly for t=120, you still get 20.5, not 40.5.

At this step:

(1/4)Ln(y) = -(1/4)Ln(250+t)+c

You should notice that you can multiply both sides by 4 to get:

ln y = -ln(250+t) + C
y=k/(250+t), where k is a constant.
You got y=k/(250+4t) instead of y=k/(250+t), which isn't right.
 
Thanks for the reply! I actually ended up getting the right answer b/c I worked out the problem out in mathematica and it correctly simplified. However, I didn't notice (what you and Mathematica did) the discrepancy between my written work (posted) and my code ergo my erroneous function y(120) = 40... when it ='d 20...

:biggrin:
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K